Início

Questões de Concursos COSEAC

Resolva questões de COSEAC comentadas com gabarito, online ou em PDF, revisando rapidamente e fixando o conteúdo de forma prática.


2681Q1070032 | Filosofia, O Sujeito Moderno, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2023

Com base no excerto que se segue, marque a opção INCORRETA.
O pensamento moderno talvez seja mais fácil de ser compreendido por nós, pelo fato de estarmos mais próximos dele do que do antigo e do medieval, e por sermos, ainda hoje, de certo modo, herdeiros dessa tradição. Por outro lado, às vezes, é mais difícil tomarmos consciência e explicitarmos as características mais fundamentais daquilo que nos é mais familiar, exatamente porque nos acostumamos a aceitá-lo como tal.

MARCONDES, D. Iniciação à História da Filosofia. p. 151. Jorge Zahar, Rio de Janeiro: 13a. ed.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2682Q1070049 | Filosofia, A Política, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2024

A época do renascimento (séculos XV-XVI), além de representar uma mudança de paradigma importante nas artes plásticas e literatura (do Teocentrismo ao Antropocentrismo), apresentou diversas ideias políticas inspiradoras, assim como obras que se tornaram muito conhecidas nesse período. Dentre as opções a seguir, marque a que se refere a autor e obra renascentista de grande destaque e influência:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2683Q1022947 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2025

Texto associado.
Text 1

ABSTRACT

The impact of streaming services on youth television viewing habits and media literacy


Streaming services have revolutionized the entertainment industry, playing an important role in attracting young people for movies and television series. The availability of streaming services such as NetFlix, Amazon, Apple TV and other platforms have drastically reduced traditional television viewing. Because of the availability of the shows at any time, youth are used to “marathoning”, resulting in a single session watching complete seasons of different shows in one sitting.
Streaming watching has helped the youth to increase their knowledge about various cultures, beliefs, and perspectives, which has helped in improving their overall understanding of the world. However, this has also led to exposure to inappropriate content, resulting in parental monitoring of the content viewed.
The present research has identified that streaming services have beneficial effects on the media literacy of the youth. Nevertheless, the exposure to inadequate content needs to be monitored, so that the beneficial aspects of streaming viewing outweigh the harm it might cause.


Available at: 10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.946. Access 28 Nov. 2024.
Exposure to inappropriate content is mentioned in the text as:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2684Q1022951 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2025

Texto associado.
Text 3


'Blitz' review: In wartime London, a family's search for sanity
Adam Graham

By Detroit News Film Critic A mother and her son are separated in wartime London in "Blitz," director Steve McQueen's drama about clinging onto hope in the middle of chaos.
British actress Saoirse Ronan is Rita, who has to say goodbye to her son George (newcomer Elliott Heffernan, in his first role), who joins the thousands of children who are sent by train to live in the English countryside as Germany throws bombs on London during World War II.
Their parting is tense. "Don't forget to be a good boy," she tells him, all love. "I hate you," George replies. The boy, who is bi-racial and never knew his father, is scared by the situation and terrified to be on his own.
Midway into his journey, he jumps off the train to make his way back to London on foot. He ends up in a series of mini-adventures that play out like chapters in a Charles Dickens novel.
Director McQueen efficiently identifies beauty even in the darkest of spaces, whether in a subway station where people are taking cover from air raids, or in the neighborhoods destroyed by bombs. For McQueen, the diversity of London is a constant issue in the film as is the prevalence of racism. "Blitz" is a story of struggle and never giving up in the face of imminent doom.


Available at: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2024/11/21/blitz-review-in-wartime-london-afamilys-search-for-sanity/76474861007/ Access at: 27 Nov. 2024. Adapted.
The reason behind George’s rude reply to his mother’s recommendation is the fact that:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2685Q1022953 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2025

Texto associado.
Text 3


'Blitz' review: In wartime London, a family's search for sanity
Adam Graham

By Detroit News Film Critic A mother and her son are separated in wartime London in "Blitz," director Steve McQueen's drama about clinging onto hope in the middle of chaos.
British actress Saoirse Ronan is Rita, who has to say goodbye to her son George (newcomer Elliott Heffernan, in his first role), who joins the thousands of children who are sent by train to live in the English countryside as Germany throws bombs on London during World War II.
Their parting is tense. "Don't forget to be a good boy," she tells him, all love. "I hate you," George replies. The boy, who is bi-racial and never knew his father, is scared by the situation and terrified to be on his own.
Midway into his journey, he jumps off the train to make his way back to London on foot. He ends up in a series of mini-adventures that play out like chapters in a Charles Dickens novel.
Director McQueen efficiently identifies beauty even in the darkest of spaces, whether in a subway station where people are taking cover from air raids, or in the neighborhoods destroyed by bombs. For McQueen, the diversity of London is a constant issue in the film as is the prevalence of racism. "Blitz" is a story of struggle and never giving up in the face of imminent doom.


Available at: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2024/11/21/blitz-review-in-wartime-london-afamilys-search-for-sanity/76474861007/ Access at: 27 Nov. 2024. Adapted.
The review of the film Blitz offers a positive evaluation of the film. The sentence, in the text, which explicitly expresses this evaluation is:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2686Q1022956 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2025

Texto associado.
Text 4


What Was the First Book Ever Written?
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

The Epic of Gilgamesh, from ancient Mesopotamia, is often cited as the first great literary composition, although some shorter have survived that are even earlier (notably the “Kesh Temple Hymn” and “The Instructions of Shuruppak”). Apart from its length, the Epic of Gilgamesh may be considered the earliest significant composition because of its enduring impact on literature through the ages. It is believed to have influenced other ancient literary works, including the Iliad, the Odyssey, Alexander romance literature, and the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), all of which continue to have significant literary impact in their own right.


Available at: https://www.britannica.com/story/what-was-the-first-book-ever-written# Access at: 02 dec. 2024. Adapted.
The Kesh Temple Hymn and The Instructions of Shuruppak are compositions which were:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2687Q1024496 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2025

Texto associado.
Text 4


What Was the First Book Ever Written?
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

The Epic of Gilgamesh, from ancient Mesopotamia, is often cited as the first great literary composition, although some shorter have survived that are even earlier (notably the “Kesh Temple Hymn” and “The Instructions of Shuruppak”). Apart from its length, the Epic of Gilgamesh may be considered the earliest significant composition because of its enduring impact on literature through the ages. It is believed to have influenced other ancient literary works, including the Iliad, the Odyssey, Alexander romance literature, and the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), all of which continue to have significant literary impact in their own right.


Available at: https://www.britannica.com/story/what-was-the-first-book-ever-written# Access at: 02 dec. 2024. Adapted.
The Epic of Gilgamesh maybe be considered the earliest significant composition because of its great influence on:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2688Q1022964 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2024

Texto associado.

TEXT 1


What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?

October 31, 2023 By

Carrie Spector


The launch of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots has triggered an alarm for many educators, who worry about students using the technology to cheat by passing its writing off as their own. But two Stanford researchers say that concern is misdirected, based on their ongoing research into cheating among U.S. high school students before and after the release of ChatGPT.


Here, Lee and Pope discuss the state of cheating in U.S. schools, what research shows about why students cheat, and their recommendations for educators working to address the problem.


What do we know about how much students cheat?


Pope: We know that cheating rates have been high for a long time. At Challenge Success we’ve been running surveys and focus groups at schools for over 15 years, asking students about different aspects of their lives — the amount of sleep they get, homework pressure, extracurricular activities, family expectations, things like that — and also several questions about different forms of cheating.


For years, long before ChatGPT hit the scene, some 60 to 70 percent of students have reported engaging in at least one “cheating” behavior during the previous month. That percentage has stayed about the same or even decreased slightly in our 2023 surveys, when we added questions specific to new AI technologies, like ChatGPT, and how students are using it for school assignments.


So AI isn’t changing how often students cheat — just the tools that they’re using?


Lee: The most prudent thing to say right now is that the data suggest, perhaps to the surprise of many people, that AI is not increasing the frequency of cheating. This may change as students become increasingly familiar with the technology, and we’ll continue to study it and see if and how this changes. But I think it’s important to point out that, in Challenge Success’ most recent survey, students were also asked if and how they felt an AI chatbot like ChatGPT should be allowed for school-related tasks. Many said they thought it should be acceptable for “starter” purposes, like explaining a new concept or generating ideas for a paper. But the vast majority said that using a chatbot to write an entire paper should never be allowed. So this idea that students who’ve never cheated before are going to suddenly run amok and have AI write all of their papers appears unfounded. What would you suggest to school leaders who are concerned about students using AI chatbots?


Pope: Even before ChatGPT, we could never be sure whether kids were getting help from a parent or tutor or another source on their assignments, and this was not considered cheating. Kids in our focus groups are wondering why they can't use ChatGPT as another resource to help them write their papers — not to write the whole thing word for word, but to get the kind of help a parent or tutor would offer. We need to help students and educators find ways to discuss the ethics of using this technology and when it is and isn't useful for student learning.


Lee: There’s a lot of fear about students using this technology. Schools have considered putting significant amounts of money in AI-detection software, which studies show can be highly unreliable. Some districts have tried blocking AI chatbots from school wifi and devices, then repealed those bans because they were ineffective. AI is not going away. Along with addressing the deeper reasons why students cheat, we need to teach students how to understand and think critically about this technology. For starters, at Stanford we’ve begun developing free resources to help teachers bring these topics into the classroom as it relates to different subject areas. We know that 3 teachers don’t have time to introduce a whole new class, but we have been working with teachers to make sure these are activities and lessons that can fit with what they’re already covering in the time they have available.


I think of AI literacy as being akin to driver’s education: We’ve got a powerful tool that can be a great asset, but it can also be dangerous. We want students to learn how to use it responsibly.


Available from: < https://ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating>. Access: 08 Dec., 2023. Adapted.

Lee and Pope believe
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2689Q1072147 | Filosofia, Filosofia e a Grécia Antiga, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

Aristóteles gostava de dar suas aulas em caminhadas com seus discípulos, de onde surgiu o nome:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2690Q896396 | Farmácia, Farmacêutico, FEMAR RJ, COSEAC, 2024

Dose unitária é a adequação da forma farmacêutica à quantidade correspondente à dose prescrita, preservadas suas características de qualidade e rastreamento, já a dose unitarizada é a adequação da forma farmacêutica em doses previamente selecionadas para atendimento a prescrições nos serviços de saúde. O preparo de doses unitárias e a unitarização de doses de medicamentos, desde que preservadas suas características de qualidade e rastreabilidade, é permitido exclusivamente às farmácias de atendimento privativo de unidade hospitalar ou qualquer equivalente de assistência médica. Algumas disposições e requisitos devem ser atendidos pelas farmácias de atendimentoprivativo de unidade hospitalar ou equivalente de assistência médica que realizarem transformação/derivação de medicamentos.
Dentre as opções abaixo, identifique àquela que NÃO é um desses requisitos:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

2692Q1019827 | Espanhol, Interpretação de Texto Comprensión de Lectura, Língua Espanhola, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

Texto associado.

Texto 3

Lenguaje políticamente correcto


Aunque en estos últimos años, la discapacidad ha cobrado vida dentro de una sociedad cambiante como la nuestra, y lo ha hecho con verdaderos signos de inclusión social en el respeto a la diferencia, todavía debemos seguir luchando por una realidad que supere los prejuicios que etiquetan o estereotipan y califican con valoraciones sociales de “Minus-Valía” u otras acepciones ciertamente peyorativas, y que, en el fondo, en muchos casos de nuestra vida también las sufrimos y tenemos.

Son lentos los pasos que se dan, pero nuestra ansia por superar determinadas actitudes, valores y hábitos deben tener su punto de encuentro en el ser personas: todos iguales pero diferentes. No debemos discriminar independientemente de nuestra discapacidad, condición social, sexo, etnia…, debemos optar por dignificar lo que nosune y no acentuar lo que nos diferencia, nunca identificando a una persona por lo que tiene distinto.

El lenguaje es un instrumento de opresión o de liberación y en este caso sirve para perpetuar una etiqueta que margina y excluye a quien la lleva, ¿por qué menos válidos? Desde nuestro punto de vista nadie vale más que nadie, sin embargo, este término evidencia el prejuicio social.

[…]

En un proceso de normalización y de eliminación de barreras mentales todo el mundo debe saber que normalmente a una persona ciega o en silla de ruedas no le molesta que, se le diga, “¡Hasta la vista!” “¿Qué tal andas?”; lo que realmente le molesta es que su discapacidad le convierta en “minusválido”, porque la sociedad se niegue a reconocer su ser persona.

Bajo estas premisas resulta bastante desagradable leer en los titulares de la prensa: “Roban la silla a un minusválido…”, “los minusválidos podrán estudiar gratis en la universidad........”, “un minusválido accede a un ascensor…”, “un tetrapléjico resulta herido…”, ni tampoco ser objeto de comentarios que inspiren lástima y compasión, en muchos casos como medidas de sobreprotección.

[…]

La realidad muestra un cambio importante en estos momentos hacia la discapacidad, y el lenguaje es una parte muy importante por su uso y utilización, por ser el medio a través del cuál nos comunicamos, creamos una base cultural de relaciones en el respeto a la diversidad, en el contexto social en que queramos movernos, en lo que queremos asumir o diferir, en el respeto de no etiquetar, discriminar o clasificar lo que tenemos de distinto. Debemos construir una realidad adaptada a todos, signo inequívoco de estar al frente de la grandeza de que nuestros esquemas mentales son fuertes y positivos hacia dicha realidad.

Como personas que tenemos una discapacidad, debemos asumirla y renovar nuestro pensamiento de forma positiva, con nuevas formas de hacer y comunicarnos, adaptándonos a las nuevas sociedades cambiantes siempre bajo principios que nos permitan asumir roles de normalización y de ser ciudadanos de primera clase, que no perpetúen sistemas de beneficencia, sino auguren un carácter poderosamente asistencialista.

Debemos cimentar unas bases sólidas donde el respeto a la diversidad sea el eje donde pivote el avance hacia una sociedad más justa, donde los desequilibrios sean mínimos, concienciando y sensibilizando que una sociedad se construye con personas, tengan o no discapacidad , y aún siendo perseverantes quitar el apellido “discapacidad”, porque ante todo somos personas, donde el respeto, la tolerancia, el diálogo, la igualdad de oportunidades y participación, presentación de los derechos “visibles”, la cultura, la formación, el empleo, la libertad de expresión… nos hagan percibir que vivimos en una sociedad igualitaria.

Fuente: http://www.discapacidad-cantabria.info/principal/introduccion/lenguaje-politicamente-correcto.html

En el texto se considera que el término “minusvalía” tiene un carácter
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2693Q1019829 | Espanhol, Interpretação de Texto Comprensión de Lectura, Língua Espanhola, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

Texto associado.

Texto 3

Lenguaje políticamente correcto


Aunque en estos últimos años, la discapacidad ha cobrado vida dentro de una sociedad cambiante como la nuestra, y lo ha hecho con verdaderos signos de inclusión social en el respeto a la diferencia, todavía debemos seguir luchando por una realidad que supere los prejuicios que etiquetan o estereotipan y califican con valoraciones sociales de “Minus-Valía” u otras acepciones ciertamente peyorativas, y que, en el fondo, en muchos casos de nuestra vida también las sufrimos y tenemos.

Son lentos los pasos que se dan, pero nuestra ansia por superar determinadas actitudes, valores y hábitos deben tener su punto de encuentro en el ser personas: todos iguales pero diferentes. No debemos discriminar independientemente de nuestra discapacidad, condición social, sexo, etnia…, debemos optar por dignificar lo que nosune y no acentuar lo que nos diferencia, nunca identificando a una persona por lo que tiene distinto.

El lenguaje es un instrumento de opresión o de liberación y en este caso sirve para perpetuar una etiqueta que margina y excluye a quien la lleva, ¿por qué menos válidos? Desde nuestro punto de vista nadie vale más que nadie, sin embargo, este término evidencia el prejuicio social.

[…]

En un proceso de normalización y de eliminación de barreras mentales todo el mundo debe saber que normalmente a una persona ciega o en silla de ruedas no le molesta que, se le diga, “¡Hasta la vista!” “¿Qué tal andas?”; lo que realmente le molesta es que su discapacidad le convierta en “minusválido”, porque la sociedad se niegue a reconocer su ser persona.

Bajo estas premisas resulta bastante desagradable leer en los titulares de la prensa: “Roban la silla a un minusválido…”, “los minusválidos podrán estudiar gratis en la universidad........”, “un minusválido accede a un ascensor…”, “un tetrapléjico resulta herido…”, ni tampoco ser objeto de comentarios que inspiren lástima y compasión, en muchos casos como medidas de sobreprotección.

[…]

La realidad muestra un cambio importante en estos momentos hacia la discapacidad, y el lenguaje es una parte muy importante por su uso y utilización, por ser el medio a través del cuál nos comunicamos, creamos una base cultural de relaciones en el respeto a la diversidad, en el contexto social en que queramos movernos, en lo que queremos asumir o diferir, en el respeto de no etiquetar, discriminar o clasificar lo que tenemos de distinto. Debemos construir una realidad adaptada a todos, signo inequívoco de estar al frente de la grandeza de que nuestros esquemas mentales son fuertes y positivos hacia dicha realidad.

Como personas que tenemos una discapacidad, debemos asumirla y renovar nuestro pensamiento de forma positiva, con nuevas formas de hacer y comunicarnos, adaptándonos a las nuevas sociedades cambiantes siempre bajo principios que nos permitan asumir roles de normalización y de ser ciudadanos de primera clase, que no perpetúen sistemas de beneficencia, sino auguren un carácter poderosamente asistencialista.

Debemos cimentar unas bases sólidas donde el respeto a la diversidad sea el eje donde pivote el avance hacia una sociedad más justa, donde los desequilibrios sean mínimos, concienciando y sensibilizando que una sociedad se construye con personas, tengan o no discapacidad , y aún siendo perseverantes quitar el apellido “discapacidad”, porque ante todo somos personas, donde el respeto, la tolerancia, el diálogo, la igualdad de oportunidades y participación, presentación de los derechos “visibles”, la cultura, la formación, el empleo, la libertad de expresión… nos hagan percibir que vivimos en una sociedad igualitaria.

Fuente: http://www.discapacidad-cantabria.info/principal/introduccion/lenguaje-politicamente-correcto.html

En este texto, el enunciador se muestra partidario de un sistema de asistencia social que acabe con la
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2694Q1019831 | Espanhol, Verbos Verbos, Língua Espanhola, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

Texto associado.

Texto 4


REGLAS DE USO DEL LENGUAJE NO SEXISTA


o Utilizar un lenguaje igualitario y no excluyente permite visibilizar a las mujeres, rompiendo con estereotipos y prejuicios sexistas; por todo ello, es necesario modificar el enfoque androcéntrico de las expresiones, nombrando correctamente a mujeres y hombres.

o Es perfectamente compatible el uso de las normas gramaticales y estilísticas con el uso no sexista de la lengua.

o El uso innecesario o abusivo del masculino genérico es un obstáculo a la igualdad real entre mujeres y hombres porque oculta a las mujeres y produce ambigüedad, por lo que ha de evitarse su utilización en textos y documentos.

o Para sustituir el masculino genérico se emplearán términos colectivos, abstractos o vocablos no marcados, perífrasis o metonimias. Cuando no produce ambigüedad, se puede omitir la referencia directa o bien utilizar infinitivos o pronombres.

o Se utilizarán, siempre que sea posible, las denominaciones de cargos, profesiones y titulaciones en femenino, mediante el morfema de género y/o el artículo. Cuando su uso se haga en plural, se evitará la utilización del genérico masculino.

o En los casos en los que el texto se refiera a quien posee la titularidad de una entidad, área o institución, el lenguaje se adecuará al masculino o al femenino en función de si se trata de un hombre o una mujer. Es importante recordar que la lengua castellana tiene marca de género por lo que los cargos ocupados por mujeres deben recogerse en femenino.

o Los documentos administrativos deben dirigirse a la ciudadanía con fórmulas que nombren específicamente a las mujeres cuando se conoce su sexo. Cuando se desconoce quien será la persona destinataria, se usarán fórmulas que engloben a ambos sexos, evitando el uso del masculino genérico.

o El uso de dobletes mediante barras queda limitado a los formularios de carácter abierto y a determinados encabezamientos, no utilizándose en ningún caso en otro tipo de redactados.

o No es recomendable el uso de la @, que no es un signo lingüístico, sobre todo teniendo en cuenta la variedad de recursos que ofrece la lengua para evitar un uso no sexista del lenguaje.

o Tradicionalmente, el género masculino precede siempre al femenino cuando hay mención expresa de ambos sexos. Se propone por ello que el masculino no siempre se anteponga al femenino, de modo que este último también pueda aparecer en primer lugar, o que se alterne con el masculino.


Fuente: GUÍA DE LENGUAJE NO SEXISTA. Oficina de Igualdad de la UNED (UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA).https://www.udc.es/export/sites/udc/oficinaigualdade/_galeria_down/documentos/GUIA_LENGUAJE.PDF

Para establecer las reglas de uso del lenguaje no sexista, el texto utiliza, principalmente, formas verbales en
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2695Q1070028 | Filosofia, O Sujeito Moderno, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

“A origem da tragédia”, “Humano, demasiado humano”, “Além do bem e do mal” e “O crepúsculo dos ídolos” são algumas das obras escritas por:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2696Q1070029 | Filosofia, O Sujeito Moderno, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2022

Com a Revolução Industrial, a racionalidade técnica e instrumental passou a dominar a modernidade. Contra isso, os pensadores da Escola de Frankfurt formularam a:
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2697Q1070034 | Filosofia, O Sujeito Moderno, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2023

Considerando o período da modernidade (séc. XV-XVII), assinale a opção que contém SOMENTE características do pensamento científico moderno.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2698Q1070046 | Filosofia, O Sujeito Moderno, Filosofia, UFF, COSEAC, 2024

No contexto da "Dialética do Esclarecimento," coescrita com Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno explora a relação entre racionalidade e dominação na sociedade moderna.

Indique qual dos seguintes conceitos destaca a crítica adorniana à instrumentalização da razão.

  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2699Q1022962 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2024

Texto associado.

TEXT 1


What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?

October 31, 2023 By

Carrie Spector


The launch of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots has triggered an alarm for many educators, who worry about students using the technology to cheat by passing its writing off as their own. But two Stanford researchers say that concern is misdirected, based on their ongoing research into cheating among U.S. high school students before and after the release of ChatGPT.


Here, Lee and Pope discuss the state of cheating in U.S. schools, what research shows about why students cheat, and their recommendations for educators working to address the problem.


What do we know about how much students cheat?


Pope: We know that cheating rates have been high for a long time. At Challenge Success we’ve been running surveys and focus groups at schools for over 15 years, asking students about different aspects of their lives — the amount of sleep they get, homework pressure, extracurricular activities, family expectations, things like that — and also several questions about different forms of cheating.


For years, long before ChatGPT hit the scene, some 60 to 70 percent of students have reported engaging in at least one “cheating” behavior during the previous month. That percentage has stayed about the same or even decreased slightly in our 2023 surveys, when we added questions specific to new AI technologies, like ChatGPT, and how students are using it for school assignments.


So AI isn’t changing how often students cheat — just the tools that they’re using?


Lee: The most prudent thing to say right now is that the data suggest, perhaps to the surprise of many people, that AI is not increasing the frequency of cheating. This may change as students become increasingly familiar with the technology, and we’ll continue to study it and see if and how this changes. But I think it’s important to point out that, in Challenge Success’ most recent survey, students were also asked if and how they felt an AI chatbot like ChatGPT should be allowed for school-related tasks. Many said they thought it should be acceptable for “starter” purposes, like explaining a new concept or generating ideas for a paper. But the vast majority said that using a chatbot to write an entire paper should never be allowed. So this idea that students who’ve never cheated before are going to suddenly run amok and have AI write all of their papers appears unfounded. What would you suggest to school leaders who are concerned about students using AI chatbots?


Pope: Even before ChatGPT, we could never be sure whether kids were getting help from a parent or tutor or another source on their assignments, and this was not considered cheating. Kids in our focus groups are wondering why they can't use ChatGPT as another resource to help them write their papers — not to write the whole thing word for word, but to get the kind of help a parent or tutor would offer. We need to help students and educators find ways to discuss the ethics of using this technology and when it is and isn't useful for student learning.


Lee: There’s a lot of fear about students using this technology. Schools have considered putting significant amounts of money in AI-detection software, which studies show can be highly unreliable. Some districts have tried blocking AI chatbots from school wifi and devices, then repealed those bans because they were ineffective. AI is not going away. Along with addressing the deeper reasons why students cheat, we need to teach students how to understand and think critically about this technology. For starters, at Stanford we’ve begun developing free resources to help teachers bring these topics into the classroom as it relates to different subject areas. We know that 3 teachers don’t have time to introduce a whole new class, but we have been working with teachers to make sure these are activities and lessons that can fit with what they’re already covering in the time they have available.


I think of AI literacy as being akin to driver’s education: We’ve got a powerful tool that can be a great asset, but it can also be dangerous. We want students to learn how to use it responsibly.


Available from: < https://ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating>. Access: 08 Dec., 2023. Adapted.

Banning AI chatbots from school wi-fi and buying AI-detection software are measures that have shown to be
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2700Q1022969 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Língua Inglesa, UFF, COSEAC, 2024

Texto associado.

TEXT 2

Workplace Burnout Survey

Burnout without borders


Deloitte’s external survey explores the drivers and impact of prolonged, unmanageable stress that may lead to employee burnout.

Deloitte’s marketplace survey on burnout

Professionals today are undoubtedly feeling the pressure of an ‘always on’ work culture, causing stress and sometimes leading to burnout.

Deloitte’s external marketplace survey of 1,000 full-time US professionals explores the drivers and impact of employee burnout, while also providing insight into the benefits and programs employees feel can help prevent or alleviate burnout versus those their companies are currently offering.


The findings indicate that 77 percent of respondents say they have experienced employee burnout at their current job, with more than half citing more than one occurrence. The survey also uncovered that employers may be missing the mark whenit comes to developing well-being programs that their employees find valuable to address stress in the workplace.

Additionally, the survey found that:


  • Employee burnout has no boundaries: 91 percent of respondents say having an unmanageable amount of stress or frustration negatively impacts the quality of their work. 83 percent of respondents say burnout from work can negatively impact their personal relationships.


  • Passion may not prevent workplace stress: 87 percent of professionals surveyed say they have passion for their current job but 64 percent say they are frequently stressed, dispelling the myth that passionate employees are immune to stress or burnout.


  • Many companies may not be doing enough to minimize burnout: Nearly 70 percent of professionals feel their employers are not doing enough to prevent or alleviate burnout within their organization. 21 percent of respondents say their company does not offer any programs or initiatives to prevent or alleviate burnout.
  • Companies should consider workplace culture, not just well-being programs: One in four professionals say they never or rarely take all of their vacation days. The top driver of burnout cited in the survey is lack of support or recognition from leadership, indicating the important role that leaders play in setting the tone.


  • Burnout affects millennial retention: 84 percent of millennials say they have experienced burnout at their current job, compared to 77 percent of all respondents. Nearly half of millennials say they have left a job specifically because they felt burned out, compared to 42 percent of all respondents.


from: <https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/burnout-survey.html> Access: 08 Dec., 2023. Adapted

The specific factor that is cited as the top cause of burnout in the survey, indicating the crucial role of leadership in addressing the issue is
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
Utilizamos cookies e tecnologias semelhantes para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação. Política de Privacidade.