Início

Questões de Concursos TCE GO

Resolva questões de TCE GO comentadas com gabarito, online ou em PDF, revisando rapidamente e fixando o conteúdo de forma prática.


1501Q1063981 | Legislação dos Tribunais de Contas TCU, Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Determinada Câmara do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás aplicou sanções a João, ordenador de despesas no âmbito da Administração Pública indireta do poder público estadual, isto por ter constatado ilegalidade na realização de uma despesa. Irresignado com o teor dessa decisão, João almejava obter a sua reforma com a interposição do recurso cabível.
À luz do Regimento Interno do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, é correto afirmar que
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1502Q1059913 | Estatística, Cálculo de Probabilidades, Controle Externo, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Numa população, 50% das pessoas sofrem de um certo mal.

Se um grupo de 5 pessoas for aleatoriamente sorteado, com reposição, dessa população, a probabilidade de que duas dessas pessoas sofram desse mal é aproximadamente igual a

  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1503Q1049991 | Legislação Estadual, Legislação do Estado de Goiás, Jurídica, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Jeane é servidora de cargo efetivo no Estado de Goiás, mas decidiu se afastar, sem vencimentos, para dedicar-se integralmente aos estudos visando a aprovação no concurso público para o Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, instituição que almeja integrar como analista de controle externo. Sobre a situação de Jeane, e considerando os termos da Lei
Complementar estadual nº 161/2020, marque a alternativa correta em relação ao período de afastamento.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1504Q1049994 | Direito Previdenciário, Salário de Contribuição, Jurídica, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Rosangela é servidora pública do Estado de Goiás, ocupando cargo efetivo, e atua em Jataí/GO. Em seu contracheque constam diversas parcelas e Rosangela está em dúvida sobre a forma de cálculo da contribuição previdenciária.
as parcelas abaixo, retiradas do contracheque de Rosangela, marque aquela sobre a qual haverá recolhimento de contribuição previdenciária da servidora em comento.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1505Q1023729 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1506Q1063978 | Português, Interpretação de Textos, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

As frases a seguir mostram forma negativa.
Assinale a opção em que a modificação para a forma positiva mantém o sentido original.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1507Q1059898 | Redes de Computadores, Protocolo, Tecnologia da Informação, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

A Internet é formada por um grande número de sistemas autônomos (SAs). Cada SA é operado por uma organização diferente e pode usar seu próprio algoritmo de roteamento interno. Um algoritmo de roteamento em um SA é chamado de protocolo de gateway interior, já um algoritmo para roteamento entre SAs é chamado de protocolo de gateway exterior.
A respeito desses protocolos, analise os itens a seguir:
I. O protocolo de gateway interior recomendado na Internet é o BGP; II. O protocolo OSPF é baseado no roteamento de vetor de distância; III. Os protocolos de gateway exterior foram projetados para permitir a imposição de muitos tipos de políticas de roteamento no tráfego entre SAs.
Está correto o que se afirma em
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1508Q1064006 | Direito Constitucional, Administração Pública, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Ao estudar a remuneração, direitos e vantagens no âmbito da remuneração dos agentes públicos, Helena verificou que o subsídio é uma espécie remuneratória que tem definição constitucional, de modo que decidiu aprofundar os estudos acerca das respectivas peculiaridades.
Nesse contexto, considerando o disposto na CRFB/88 e a orientação do Supremo Tribunal Federal acerca do tema, é correto afirmar que o subsídio
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1509Q1049995 | Direito Previdenciário, Regime Geral de Previdência Social, Jurídica, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Jordana reside em Catalão/GO, aposentou-se de forma comum em 2023 pelo Regime Geral de Previdência Social mas, por dificuldade financeira, resolveu procurar emprego, conseguindo colocação num pequeno comércio da localidade, onde recebe o correspondente a 2 salários mínimos – valor até superior à sua aposentadoria.
Considerando os fatos narrados, marque a alternativa que identifica o que ocorrerá com a aposentadoria de Jordana.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1510Q1023726 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F):

( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.

The statements are, respectively
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1511Q1023727 | Inglês, Advérbios e Conjunções Adverbs And Conjunctions, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1512Q1023732 | Inglês, Vocabulário Vocabulary, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The word “roughly” in “Over the past roughly 50,000 years” (5th paragraph) indicates a(n)
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1513Q1023730 | Inglês, Adjetivos Adjectives, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1514Q1023731 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
According to the text, the word that “this extraordinary gift” (5th paragraph) refers to is our
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1515Q1023733 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The text ends in a note of
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️

1516Q1023728 | Inglês, Interpretação de Texto Reading Comprehension, Ciências Contábeis, TCE GO, FGV, 2024

Texto associado.
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The expression “such as” in “such as climate change” (2nd paragraph) can be replaced without significant change in meaning by
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
  5. ✂️
Utilizamos cookies e tecnologias semelhantes para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação. Política de Privacidade.