Questões de Concursos UEG

Since 2000 when the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) launched a global academic benchmark for measuring student outcomes by testing 15-year-olds, many global education systems have been impacted by what sometimes looks and feels like a race to rank high.
When the OECD launched the Programme for International Student Assessment — PISA — the idea was to enable countries to make cross-national comparisons of student achievement using a common/standard metric to increase human capital. In other words, higher academic achievement should corelate with earnings in the future and a country’s standard of living. As PISA states, it publishes the results of the test a year after the students are tested to help governments shape their education policies.
As PISA has developed, through seven global testing rounds every three years, with the first in 2000 and the most recent in 2018, for some it has gained a reputation as the “Olympics of education” given the widespread attention that country rankings receive following the release of results.
Now, partly in the face of criticisms, PISA is looking at expanding how and what it tests. As this process unfolds, policy-makers must remember that the social consequences of a test are just as important as the test’s content. Putting a new face on PISA will undoubtedly present various opportunities and challenges.
To date, PISA has been restricted to what is generally called the “cognitive” side of learning, focusing on reading, mathematics and scientific literacy. In addition to test questions, students and school principals fill out questionnaires to provide contextual information on student and school environment characteristics that can be associated with more or less favourable performance.
Countries that excel in PISA tests, such as Finland, a country with less than six million people, have become regarded by policy-makers as a “global reference society” — an ideal to aspire to — due to their high performance in PISA rankings.
Asian countries or jurisdictions like Singapore, Hong Kong (China) and Japan tend to consistently achieve exceptional PISA performances and hence get a lot of attention from other countries wishing to emulate their success via borrowing policy. For example, England flew teachers out to China to study mathematics teaching.
In the next administration in 2021, PISA will tackle creative thinking, trying to find ways to assess, and have students assess, flexibility in thinking and habits of creativity such as being inquisitive and persistent. The PISA team is also developing a way of testing students’ digital learning, which should be ready in time for the 2024 assessment.
However, it should be remembered that education policies from high achieving nations don’t migrate across international boundaries without consideration given to national and cultural contexts. Rather, innovations and changes in education require teachers to have the time and opportunity to re-educate themselves in relation to more recent insights in what it means to get the best out of children.

The OECD will need to respond to previous critiques and provide greater transparency around newer test instruments and the choices made to arrive at rankings. The latter is no small challenge since the future focus of PISA is based on topics which seem more difficult to evaluate than math, science or reading skills.

Leia a letra da música a seguir.

REENGENHARIA

Itamar Assumpção

Meu amor eu tive uma ideia genial

Que tal inserir nosso lar na economia global

É muito simples não tem filosofia

É só fazer a tal reengenharia

No mundo todo vai que é uma beleza

Por que não fazer igualzinho lá em casa, hein princesa

É só jogar no lixo o que não precisa

A tua mãe, por exemplo, a gente terceiriza

Não se preocupe com a culinária

Agora ficou chique comer porcaria

Ter urticária o que que há de mal afinal

É só um bocadinho de mesquinharia

Meu bem não vejo a hora de fazer economia de escala

O mala do nosso vizinho pegamos botamos fora

A mulher dele a gente incorpora

Vamos acabar com todo desperdício

Afinal qual é o mal é só a beira do precipício

Os amigos a gente elimina

E traz só de brinquedinho baratinho lá da China

Vamos criar um lar bem competitivo

Um lar que seja voltado só para um objetivo

Entre o ativo e o passivo

Vamos ver qual de nós dois ainda continua vivo

Vamos cair de boca no pragmatismo

Afinal qual é o mal, é só a beira do abismo

Querida vamos acabar com todo sossego

Dar um basta nos sentimentos e nos momentos de aconchego

Pulmão otimizado coração desativado no seguro desemprego

Nosso lar vai virar uma operação enxuta

Com muito mais inveja, com muito mais disputa

Afinal qual é o mal em ser só um tiquinho filho da puta

Vamos concentrar nossa vocação meu bem

Ficar querendo o que a gente não tem

Oh! Meu amor eu quero detonar o quarteirão o mundo o bairro

Só pra comprar nosso segundo carro

Oh! Meu amor quando tudo der certo

Ficaremos só nós dois num lindo deserto

Vai ser legal ser moderno aqui no meio do inferno

Poderemos gravar tudo isso em vídeo

Afinal qual é o mal é só um pouquinho de suicídio

Teu irmão eu aniquilo teu pai jogamos no asilo

É, só vamos comer por quilo

Disponível em:<https://www.letras.mus.br/itamar-assumpcao/272498/>. Acesso em: 23 mar. 2017.

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.

Who's driving?Autonomous cars may be entering the most dangerous phase

Autopilot controls are not yet fully capable of functioning without human intervention – but they’re good enough to lull us into a false sense of security.
When California police officers approached a Tesla stopped in the centre of a five-lane highway outside San Francisco last week, they found a man asleep at the wheel. The driver, who was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, told them his car was in “autopilot”, Tesla’s semi-autonomous driver assist system.
In a separate incident, firefighters in Culver City reported that a Tesla vehicle parked at the rear of their fire truck as it attended an accident on the freeway. Again, the driver said the vehicle was in autopilot.

The oft-repeated promise of driverless technology is that it will make the roads safer by reducing human error, the primary cause of accidents. However, those vehicles have a long way to go before they can eliminate the drivers.

However, research has shown that drivers get lulled into a false sense of security to the point where their minds and gazes start to wander away from the road. People become distracted or preoccupied with their smartphones. So when the car encounters a situation where the human needs to intervene, the driver can be slow to react.

During tests the IIHS recorded a Mercedes having problems when the lane on the highway forked in two. The radar system locked onto the right-hand exit lane when the driver was trying to go straight.

Concern over this new type of distracted driving is forcing engineers to introduce additional safety features to compensate. For example, GM has introduced eye-tracking technology to check the driver’s eyes are on the road while Tesla drivers can be locked out of autopilot if they ignore warnings to keep their hands on the steering wheel.

In spite of these problems, Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, remains bullish about his company’s autonomous technology, even suggesting that by 2019 drivers would be able to sleep in their cars – presumably without being arrested by highway patrol officers.

Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/24/self-driving-cars-dangerous-period-false-security>. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2018. (Adaptado).