Questões de Concursos Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais

Resolva questões de Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais comentadas com gabarito, online ou em PDF, revisando rapidamente e fixando o conteúdo de forma prática.

Filtrar questões
💡 Caso não encontre resultados, diminua os filtros.

1Q943104 | Sociologia, Cultura e sociedade, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Quando da unificação da Itália em 1861, um político de nome Massimo d’Azeglio afirmou: “Fizemos a Itália. Agora é preciso fazer os italianos”. Este curioso fato aponta para questões que parte dos sociólogos e cientistas sociais, de modo geral, estudam e investigam: a formação sociocultural da Nação e do Nacionalismo. Muitas das nações hoje existentes se formaram há mais de duzentos anos, contudo, existem movimentos nacionalistas pelo mundo que ainda lutam por formar novos Estados-Nação independentes como os bascos, na Espanha. No Brasil, nos últimos anos, muitas pessoas reacenderam um sentimento nacionalista motivadas por posicionamentos e desavenças político-ideológicas e proclamam um “orgulho renovado de ser brasileiro”.
Partindo de uma perspectiva sociológica sobre as ideias de nação e/ou nacionalismo na atualidade, é correto afirmar que
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

2Q943105 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

According to the text, tropical forests are being cut down, among other reasons, for
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

3Q943106 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

The initiative effort of countries and companies to protect tropical forests is in line with the attempt to
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

4Q943107 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

According to John Kerry, the LEAF coalition constitutes an essential endeavor towards the
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

5Q943108 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Statistics related to deforestation in tropical forests show that in 2020 it
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

6Q943109 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

The text mentions situations in which sometimes companies have tried to fund projects in defense of tropical forests, but were prey to circumstances related to
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

7Q943110 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Countries that will benefit from the investments of the LEAF coalition, will have to
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

8Q943111 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Still about the countries which will receive financial support from the coalition to reduce emissions and deforestation, the text mentions that they will
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

9Q943112 | Inglês, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Texto associado.

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”

An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

As for the companies which will be part of the LEAF coalition, they must have the commitment to
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

10Q943051 | Matemática, Frações e Números Decimais, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

A turma 02 do Colégio São Bento tem, ao todo, 28 alunos cujas idades variam entre 9, 10 e 11 anos. Sabendo que 3/4 dos alunos têm menos de 11 anos de idade e que 5/7 dos alunos têm mais de 9 anos de idade, é correto afirmar que o número de alunos com 10 anos de idade é
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

11Q943052 | Matemática, Polígonos Regulares, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Uma das diagonais de um trapézio retângulo o decompõe em dois triângulos, sendo um deles equilátero cuja medida do lado é 24 cm. Assim, é correto dizer que a medida da área do trapézio, em cm2 , é
Nota: Um trapézio retângulo é um trapézio no qual dois de seus ângulos internos são retos.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

12Q943053 | Matemática, Funções Trigonométricas e Funções Trigonométricas Inversas, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

No plano, com o sistema de coordenadas cartesianas usual, a interseção dos gráficos das funções reais de variável real f(x)=sen(x) e g(x)=cos(x) são, para cada número inteiro k, os pontos P(xk, yk). Então, os possíveis valores para yk são
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

13Q943054 | Matemática, Função Exponencial, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Sejam f e g funções reais de variável real definidas por f(x) = 2x e g(x) = x3 . Se h = g ° f é a função composta de g com f (isto é, h(x) = g(f(x))), então, a expressão que define a função h-1 , inversa da função h, é h-1 (x) igual a
Nota: Se a e z são números reais positivos e a≠1, loga(z) é o logaritmo de z na base a.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

14Q943055 | Matemática, Relações Trigonométricas no Triângulo Retângulo, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Seja XYZ um triângulo retângulo em Y cuja medida do cateto XY é igual a 6 cm. Se a perpendicular a XZ que contém o ponto médio M do cateto XY intercepta XZ no ponto P, e se a medida do segmento PM é igual a 1,5 cm, então, a medida, em cm, do segmento MZ é igual a
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

16Q681424 | Filosofia, Pensamentos Políticos, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

“O movimento, repleno de contradições, da sociedade capitalista faz-se sentir ao burguês prático de modo mais contundente nos vaivéns do ciclo periódico que a indústria moderna percorre e em seu ponto culminante – a crise geral.”
Marx, Karl. Posfácio à Segunda Edição [1873] de O capital: Crítica da economia política, I/1. Trad. br. Flávio R. Kothe e Régis Barbosa. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1983, p. 21.
Essa concepção de Marx, de que o capitalismo é um “repleno de contradições”, tem base em uma
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

17Q943057 | Matemática, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Sejam W e V, respectivamente, os conjuntos das raízes, no universo dos números complexos, das equações x2 – 2x – 1 = 0 e x4 + 13x2 + 36 = 0. Se X = W ∪ V, então, a soma dos quadrados dos elementos de X é igual a
Nota: i é o número complexo cujo quadrado é igual a –1.
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

19Q943059 | Matemática, Pirâmides, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

Considere uma pirâmide regular, cuja base é um quadrado, contida em uma esfera, de tal modo que a base da pirâmide contém o centro da esfera e os vértices da pirâmide sejam pontos da superfície esférica. Se a medida do raio da esfera é igual a 1 metro, então, a medida do volume da pirâmide em metros cúbicos é igual a
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️

20Q943060 | História e Geografia de Estados e Municípios, Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais, UECE, UECE CEV, 2021

A imprensa local veiculou, no último mês de novembro, que o pesquisador cearense Licínio Nunes de Miranda, em sua pesquisa de doutoramento, encontrou, no cemitério São João Batista, em Fortaleza, o túmulo esquecido do herói nacional Francisco José do Nascimento, desta forma trazendo à tona o importante papel deste personagem
  1. ✂️
  2. ✂️
  3. ✂️
  4. ✂️
Utilizamos cookies e tecnologias semelhantes para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação. Política de Privacidade.