O golpe civil-militar de 1964 foi arquitetado e
realizado por um conjunto de forças e
interesses, composto por militares das
Forças Armadas, empresários brasileiros,
latifundiários (proprietários de grandes
parcelas de terras) e por empresas
estrangeiras instaladas no país,
principalmente aquelas pertencentes ao setor
automobilístico, além da Embaixada dos
Estados Unidos. A deposição arbitrária de
João Goulart (1961-1964) foi a expressão do
início de uma ditadura que durou 21 anos
sob o domínio do arbítrio e do terrorismo de
Estado. O longo período da ditadura
brasileira (1964-1985) foi caracterizado pelo
endividamento externo; pela concentração de
renda e pelo caráter repressivo. Caráter este
marcado por sequestros de opositores;
torturas; execução extrajudicial que, em
muitos casos, era decorrência da própria
tortura; ocultação de cadáver com o apoio de
diversos elementos da sociedade civil
(empresários e banqueiros) e dos núcleos do
sistema repressivo. A partir do exposto,
assinale a alternativa correta.
Sobre a Estrutura Fundiária Brasileira, assinale a alternativa correta.
Qual é a velocidade de uma partícula que tem
um momento de 5 Mev/c e uma energia
relativística total de 10 Mev?
Existem dois números de cinco algarismos
distintos que satisfazem às seguintes
condições:
• ambos são divisíveis por 9 e por 5;
• o segundo algarismo é o dobro do
primeiro e a soma desses dois
algarismos é 6;
• o quarto algarismo é a soma do
primeiro e do terceiro algarismos.
Nessas condições, a diferença entre o maior número e o menor número é um número
Nessas condições, a diferença entre o maior número e o menor número é um número
The correct reported speech form for the sentence
“Most of the laboratories there were lost, too, and the
research of several professors. I'm not sure you can say
the impact of what was lost”, said by Dimila Mothé, is:
No ano de 2018, foi realizada uma pesquisa, utilizando-se questionários sobre educação. Nessa pesquisa, João,
Alfredo e Enéias tabularam as respostas dos
questionários, respondidos pelos usuários de uma
determinada universidade. Sabendo-se que João tabulou
um quarto do total de questionários, Alfredo tabulou
três quintos do que sobrou e Enéias tabulou os 1020
questionários restantes, a diferença entre os números de
questionários tabulados por Enéias e João foi de:
A questão é referente à obra A dança dos cabelos, de Carlos Herculano Lopes.
Leia o seguinte excerto:
“Assentada neste banco onde a empregada me trouxe o jantar e após a sobremesa uma garrafa de café, estou com os olhos no azul da serra e no sol que nele se abriga, nessa estranha hora em que o silêncio é cortado apenas pelo berro de uma rês ou pelo cruzar de uma ave, e em que faço mais um cigarro, sem, no entanto, livrar-me dos latejos que em fincadas sucessivas voltam às minhas pernas e doem como as antigas lembranças de minha infância.”
LOPES, Carlos Herculano. A dança dos cabelos. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2017.
Considerando que o romance apresenta,
entre outras, três personagens
femininas, sendo estas avó, mãe e filha,
todas com o nome de Isaura, assinale a
alternativa correta em relação ao trecho
apresentado.
Ao se observar a natureza, é possível se
deparar com diferentes animais capazes
de voar, como diferentes insetos,
pássaros e mamíferos. Esses animais
possuem asas adaptadas à função de
voar que têm origens embrionárias
diferentes, sendo assim denominadas
órgãos análogos. A adaptação evolutiva
a modos de vida semelhantes leva
organismos pouco aparentados a
desenvolver formas corporais análogas.
Esse processo é denominado
Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film
Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.
Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
[…]
Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
[…]
After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.
The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
[…]
Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
[…]
How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
[…]
Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
[…]
The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that
“Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate
with many female climate scientists”. Mark
the option which best describes the meaning
of Nina’s statement.
O Reino Animal, Animalia ou Metazoa é constituído por espécimes heterótrofos que necessitam ingerir ou absorver moléculas orgânicas pré-formadas de outros seres vivos para aquisição de energia e síntese das moléculas de que precisam. Os seres que pertencem ao Reino Animal são eucariontes e pluricelulares. Eles possuem capacidade de locomoção e de reprodução sexuada. Os animais vertebrados (que possuem vértebras) e os animais invertebrados (que não possuem vértebras) são classificados em diversos filos.
Sobre os animais invertebrados e os vertebrados, analise as afirmativas a seguir:
I- Nos artrópodes e na maioria dos moluscos, o sistema circulatório é aberto (lacunar), ou seja, o líquido bombeado pelo coração periodicamente abandona os vasos e cai em lacunas corporais.
II- Nos artrópodes e na maioria dos insetos, a respiração é traqueal; nos aracnídeos, além da traqueal, também é observada a filotraqueal; e os crustáceos em geral respiram por brânquias.
III- Nos anelídeos e nos vertebrados, o sistema circulatório é fechado, o sangue circula por uma grande rede de vasos pelos quais ocorrem as trocas de substâncias entre o sangue e os tecidos.
IV- Nos vertebrados, o sistema respiratório pode ser pulmonar ou branquial, ou seja, os processos de trocas gasosas ocorrem nos pulmões ou nas brânquias.
Estão CORRETAS as afirmativas:
Leia o fragmento a seguir:
“Então, quando o cabo do braçalote gemeu, encapelando-se no Cais da verga até os cotovelos do horizonte sem fim, sua memória também rangeu com os dentes da catraca, e pôde lembrar-se de quando estourara a notícia da prisão [...]: o outrora arguto Conde de Oeiras fora considerado traidor e condenado à morte. Subira ao trono [...] e com ela todo o desencanto com a monarquia.”
Fonte: BARRETO, Antônio. A barca dos amantes. 4ª ed. Belo Horizonte[MG]: Lê, p. 27. 2018. [Fragmento: Adaptado]
O fragmento de Antônio Barreto, na obra “A barca dos amantes”, em suas lacunas, retrata personagens históricos como, EXCETO:
Brazil must legalise drugs – its existing policy just destroys lives
For decades, guns and imprisonment have been the hallmarks of Brazil’s war against the drug trafficking. But the only way to beat the gangs is to stop creating criminals, says a top Brazilian judge
“The war raging in Rocinha, Latin America’s largest favela, has already been lost. Rooted in a dispute between gangs for control of drug trafficking, it has disrupted the daily life of the community in Rio de Janeiro since mid-September. With the sound of shots coming from all sides, schools and shops are constantly forced to close. Recently, a stray bullet killed a Spanish tourist. The war is not the only thing being lost.
For decades, Brazil has had the same drug policy approach. Police, weapons and numerous arrests. It does not take an expert to conclude the obvious: the strategy has failed. Drug trafficking and consumption have only increased. […]
In a case still before the Brazilian supreme court, I voted for decriminalising the possession of marijuana for private consumption. […]
Drugs are an issue that has a profound impact on the criminal justice system, and it is legitimate for the supreme court to participate in the public debate. So here are the reasons for my views.
First, drugs are bad and it is therefore the role of the state and society to discourage consumption, treat dependents and repress trafficking. The rationale behind legalisation is rooted in the belief that it will help in achieving these goals.
Second, the war on drugs has failed. Since the 1970s, under the influence and leadership of the US, the world has tackled this problem with the use of police forces, armies, and armaments. The tragic reality is that 40 years, billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of prisoners and thousands of deaths later, things are worse. At least in countries like Brazil.
Third, as the American economist Milton Friedman argued, the only result of criminalisation is ensuring the trafficker’s monopoly.
With these points in mind, what would legalisation achieve?
In most countries in North America and Europe, the greatest concern of the authorities is users and the impact drugs have on their lives and on society. These are all important considerations. In Brazil, however, the principal focus must be ending the dominance drug dealers exercise over poor communities. Gangs have become the main political and economic power in thousands of modest neighbourhoods in Brazil. This scenario prevents a family of honest and hard-working people from educating their children away from the influence of criminal factions, who intimidate, co-opt and exercise an unfair advantage over any lawful activity. Crucially, this power of trafficking comes from illegality.
Another benefit of legalisation would be to prevent the mass incarceration of impoverished young people with no criminal record who are arrested for trafficking because they are caught in possession of negligible amounts of marijuana. A third of detainees in Brazil are imprisoned for drug trafficking. Once arrested, young prisoners will have to join one of the factions that control the penitentiaries – and on that day, they become dangerous.
[…]
We cannot be certain that a progressive and cautious policy of decriminalisation and legalisation will be successful. What we can affirm is that the existing policy of criminalisation has failed. We must take chances; otherwise, we risk simply accepting a terrible situation. As the Brazilian navigator Amyr Klink said: “The worst shipwreck is not setting off at all.”
Disponível em:<https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/nov/15/brazil-must-legalise-drugs-existing-policy-destroys-lives-luis-roberto-barroso-supreme-court-judge>
A propalada crise climática global atual tem, como uma de suas causas, a emissão de dióxido de carbono (CO²) na atmosfera. A criação de Créditos de Carbono foi umas das supostas saídas encontradas para o problema.
Sobre os Créditos de Carbono, informe se é verdadeiro (V) ou falso (F) o que se afirma a seguir e assinale a alternativa com a sequência correta.
( ) Cada Crédito de Carbono é equivalente a 1T (uma tonelada) de CO² não emitida ou retirada da atmosfera por um País.
( ) Os Créditos de Carbono foram criados, em 1997, no Japão, quando houve a assinatura do Protocolo de Kyoto pelos países que se comprometeram a assinar esse acordo.
( ) Os Estados Unidos, maior emissor de gases poluentes do mundo, lidera a aplicação das políticas definidas no Protocolo de Kyoto.
( ) Créditos de Carbono são certificados negociados como mercadorias nas bolsas de valores.
Brazil must legalise drugs – its existing policy just destroys lives
For decades, guns and imprisonment have been the hallmarks of Brazil’s war against the drug trafficking. But the only way to beat the gangs is to stop creating criminals, says a top Brazilian judge
“The war raging in Rocinha, Latin America’s largest favela, has already been lost. Rooted in a dispute between gangs for control of drug trafficking, it has disrupted the daily life of the community in Rio de Janeiro since mid-September. With the sound of shots coming from all sides, schools and shops are constantly forced to close. Recently, a stray bullet killed a Spanish tourist. The war is not the only thing being lost.
For decades, Brazil has had the same drug policy approach. Police, weapons and numerous arrests. It does not take an expert to conclude the obvious: the strategy has failed. Drug trafficking and consumption have only increased. […]
In a case still before the Brazilian supreme court, I voted for decriminalising the possession of marijuana for private consumption. […]
Drugs are an issue that has a profound impact on the criminal justice system, and it is legitimate for the supreme court to participate in the public debate. So here are the reasons for my views.
First, drugs are bad and it is therefore the role of the state and society to discourage consumption, treat dependents and repress trafficking. The rationale behind legalisation is rooted in the belief that it will help in achieving these goals.
Second, the war on drugs has failed. Since the 1970s, under the influence and leadership of the US, the world has tackled this problem with the use of police forces, armies, and armaments. The tragic reality is that 40 years, billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of prisoners and thousands of deaths later, things are worse. At least in countries like Brazil.
Third, as the American economist Milton Friedman argued, the only result of criminalisation is ensuring the trafficker’s monopoly.
With these points in mind, what would legalisation achieve?
In most countries in North America and Europe, the greatest concern of the authorities is users and the impact drugs have on their lives and on society. These are all important considerations. In Brazil, however, the principal focus must be ending the dominance drug dealers exercise over poor communities. Gangs have become the main political and economic power in thousands of modest neighbourhoods in Brazil. This scenario prevents a family of honest and hard-working people from educating their children away from the influence of criminal factions, who intimidate, co-opt and exercise an unfair advantage over any lawful activity. Crucially, this power of trafficking comes from illegality.
Another benefit of legalisation would be to prevent the mass incarceration of impoverished young people with no criminal record who are arrested for trafficking because they are caught in possession of negligible amounts of marijuana. A third of detainees in Brazil are imprisoned for drug trafficking. Once arrested, young prisoners will have to join one of the factions that control the penitentiaries – and on that day, they become dangerous.
[…]
We cannot be certain that a progressive and cautious policy of decriminalisation and legalisation will be successful. What we can affirm is that the existing policy of criminalisation has failed. We must take chances; otherwise, we risk simply accepting a terrible situation. As the Brazilian navigator Amyr Klink said: “The worst shipwreck is not setting off at all.”
Disponível em:<https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/nov/15/brazil-must-legalise-drugs-existing-policy-destroys-lives-luis-roberto-barroso-supreme-court-judge>
The text expresses the opinion of a top
Brazilian judge about drugs. Mark the
correct answer concerning the subject
matter discussed throughout the essay.
Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film
Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.
Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
[…]
Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
[…]
After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.
The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
[…]
Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
[…]
How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
[…]
Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
[…]
The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
Consider the following excerpt: “The role of
the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance,
struck another chord”. Taking into account
the context the excerpt was taken from, mark
the option which best defines the expression
“to strike a chord”.
Qual nome se dá ao efeito físico que é
decorrente da alteração da frequência
ondulatória provocada pelo movimento
relativo de aproximação ou afastamento entre
a fonte de onda e o observador?
O enredo do romance “Triste fim de Policarpo
Quaresma” gira em torno do personagem-título,
funcionário público que:
Texto 2
Trabalivre
(Tribalistas)
Um dia minha mãe me disse
Você já é grande, tem que trabalhar
Naquele instante aproveitei a chance
Vi que eu era livre para me virar
Fiz minha mala, comprei a passagem
O tempo passou depressa e eu aqui cheguei
Passei por tudo que é dificuldade
Me perdi pela cidade mas já me encontrei
Domingo boto meu pijama
Deito lá na cama para não cansar
Segunda-feira eu já tô de novo
Atolado de trabalho para entregar
Na terça não tem brincadeira
Quarta-feira tem serviço para terminar
Na quinta já tem hora extra
E na sexta o expediente termina no bar
Mas tenho o sábado inteiro pra mim mesmo
Fora do emprego
Pra me aprimorar
Sou easy, eu não entro em crise
Tenho tempo livre
Pra me trabalhar
Disponível em:<https://www.letras.mus.br/tribalistas/trabalivre/>
Assinale a alternativa correta a respeito
da música “Trabalivre” (Texto 2).
O preço do litro de determinado produto de limpeza é
igual a R$ 0,32. Se um reservatório industrial tem a
forma de um paralelepípedo retângulo reto, medindo
internamente 1,2dam × 125cm × 0,08hm, então o preço
que se pagará para encher esse reservatório com o
referido produto de limpeza será igual a:
Assinale a alternativa INCORRETA sobre o abolicionismo no Brasil.
A questão é referente à obra A dança dos cabelos, de Carlos Herculano Lopes.
Leia o seguinte excerto:
“Assentada neste banco onde a empregada me trouxe o jantar e após a sobremesa uma garrafa de café, estou com os olhos no azul da serra e no sol que nele se abriga, nessa estranha hora em que o silêncio é cortado apenas pelo berro de uma rês ou pelo cruzar de uma ave, e em que faço mais um cigarro, sem, no entanto, livrar-me dos latejos que em fincadas sucessivas voltam às minhas pernas e doem como as antigas lembranças de minha infância.”
LOPES, Carlos Herculano. A dança dos cabelos. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2017.
Considerando o título e o enredo da obra,
assinale a alternativa correta.