Read the dialogue: Person A: I arrived late to work yesterday because of the tra...

Questão de Inglês da banca FURB aplicada no concurso SED SC (2024). Confira a resolução completa abaixo:

Q1022800•
Inglês•
Análise Sintática Syntax Parsing•
FURB•
SED SC•
Língua Estrangeira Inglês•
2024

Read the dialogue:

Person A: I arrived late to work yesterday because of the traffic.
Person B: I understand. It is so difficult to be on time anywhere when the traffic is bad.
Person A: Once I move closer to work, this will not happen again. I need more quality of life.
Person B: You are totally right.

Based on the dialogue, how many subordinate clauses did we find in it?

Questões Relacionadas

Q1022083•
Inglês•
Análise Sintática Syntax Parsing•
AMEOSC•
Prefeitura de Paraíso SC•
Edital n 2•
2024

Consider the following sentences:

1."The teacher encouraged her students to read aloud every day".
2."Reading aloud every day, the teacher encouraged her students".

What syntactic difference between these two sentences impacts their interpretation?

Sentence 2 is more explicit in its meaning due to the initial placement of the verb phrase.

Sentence 1 suggests a hypothetical action, while Sentence 2 presents a definitive action by the teacher.

Sentence 1 is grammatically incorrect due to misplaced modifiers, while Sentence 2 is correct.

Sentence 1 has a clear subject-action-object structure, whereas Sentence 2 creates ambiguity about the subject performing the action.

Q944447•
Inglês•
Análise sintática Syntax Parsing•
UEMA•
UEMA•
Vestibular 2023•
2022

This text refers to question

How to Stop Eating Sugar

By David Leonhardt

If you’re like most Americans, you eat more sugar than is good for you. But it’s entirely possible to eat less sugar without sacrificing much — if any — of the pleasures of eating. Surprising as it may sound, many people who have cut back on sugar say they find their new eating habits more pleasurable than their old ones. This guide will walk you through why sugar matters, how you can make smart food choices to reduce sugar consumption, and how you can keep your life sweet, even without so many sweets.

Here's why you eat more sugar than you realize, and why it's a problem. The first thing to know: Added sugars, of one kind or another, are almost everywhere in the modern diet. They’re in sandwich bread, chicken stock, pickles, salad dressing, crackers, yogurt and cereal, as well as in the obvious foods and drinks, like soda and desserts.

The biggest problem with added sweeteners is that they make it easy to overeat. They’re tasty and highly caloric but they often don’t make you feel full. Instead, they can trick you into wanting even more food. Because we’re surrounded by added sweeteners — in our kitchens, in restaurants, at schools and offices — most of us will eat too much of them unless we consciously set out to do otherwise.

It’s not an accident. The sugar industry has conducted an aggressive, decades-long campaign to blame the obesity epidemic on fats, not sugars. Fats, after all, seem as if they should cause obesity. Thanks partly to that campaign, sugar consumption soared in the United States even as people were trying to lose weight. But research increasingly indicates that an overabundance of simple carbohydrates, and sugar in particular, is the No. 1 problem in modern diets. Sugar is the driving force behind the diabetes and obesity epidemics. Fortunately, more people are realizing the harms of sugar and cutting back.

[...]

Changing your diet is hard. If your strategy involves thinking about sugar all the time — whenever you’re shopping or eating — you’ll likely fail. You’ll also be miserable in the process. It’s much more effective to come up with a few simple rules and habits that then become second nature. (One strategy to consider: Eliminate all added sugars for one month, and then add back only the ones you miss. It’s easier than it sounds.)

Above all, most people’s goal should be to find a few simple, lasting ways to cut back on sugar. Once you’re done reading this guide, we suggest you choose two or three of our ideas and try them for a few weeks.

https://www.nytimes.com/guides/smarterliving/how-to-stop-eating-sugar (text adapted)

The extract “If you’re like most Americans”, in the first paragraph, reflects, in the order of appearance:

condition and comparison.

opposition and resistance.

similarity and opposition.

condition and addiction.

superiority and similarity.

Q1022494•
Inglês•
Análise Sintática Syntax Parsing•
VUNESP•
Prefeitura de Sertãozinho SP•
Inglês•
2025

Read the text to answer the question from.

It happens that the publication of this edition of the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary comes 250 years after the appearance of the first comprehensive dictionary of the English language, compiled by Samuel Johnson. Much has changed since then. The English that Johnson described in 1755 was relatively well defined, still essentially the national property of the British. Since then, it has dispersed and diversified, has been adopted and adapted as an international means of communication by communities all over the globe. English is now the name given to an immensely diverse variety of different usages. This obviously poses a problem of selection for the dictionary maker: which words are to be included in a dictionary, and thus granted recognition as more centrally or essentially English than the words that are left out?

Johnson did not have to deal with such diversity, but he too was exercised with this question. In his Plan of an English Dictionary, published in 1747, he considers which words it is proper to include in his dictionary; whether ‘terms of particular professions’, for example, were eligible, particularly since many of them had been derived from other languages. ‘Of such words,’ he says, ‘all are not equally to be considered as parts of our language, for some of them are naturalized and incorporated, but others still continue aliens...’. Which words are deemed to be sufficiently naturalized or incorporated to count as ‘parts of our language’, ‘real’ or proper English, and thus worthy of inclusion in a dictionary of the language, remains, of course, a controversial matter. Interestingly enough, even for Johnson the status of a word in the language was not the only, nor indeed the most important consideration. For being alien did not itself disqualify words from inclusion; in a remark which has considerable current resonance he adds: ‘some seem necessary to be retained, because the purchaser of the dictionary will expect to find them’. And, crucially, the expectations that people have of a dictionary are based on what they want to use it for. What Johnson says of his own dictionary would apply very aptly to The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (OALD): ‘The value of a work must be estimated by its use: It is not enough that a dictionary delights the critic, unless at the same time it instructs the learner...’.

(Widdowson, H. Hornby, A.S. 2010. Adaptado)

O trecho retirado do primeiro parágrafo “the first comprehensive dictionary of the English language” é um sintagma nominal – um substantivo e seus modificadores. O núcleo desse sintagma é

Notificações

Nada por aqui