Mark the correct option according to text II.

What Scott's Antarctic expedition reveals about our seas today

[1] Sea urchins preserved in glass jars in Dr Hugh Carter's desk in the Natural History Museum were coilected from the depths of the Southern Ocean by polar teams led by Sir Ernest Shackleton, Capt Robert Falcon Scott and the Norwegian Carsten Borchgrevink in the 19th and 20th centuries. They tell a tale of heroic exploration and scientific endeavour.

[

2] Now, more than a century later, a new project led by Carter has gathered samples that could be compared with those found on the expeditions that took place more than a century ago. Carter, the Natural History Museum's (NHM) curator of marine invertebrates, hopes the preserved Antarctic urchins, 50 in all, will help tell a different, increasingly urgent story of modern times: how changes in the world's southernmost waters may be affecting marine life.

[3] In January, the biologist undertook a six-week long research trip to visit the exact sites sampled by Borchgrevink's Southern Cross, Shackleton's Discovery and Scott's ill-fated Terra Nova expedition between 1898 and 1913.

[4] In the Antarctic, which is warming at twice the global average, a lack of baseline scientific data makes it difficult to assess the physical and biological changes that have occurred over time.

[5] Carter's theory is that comparing the "tests" or shell of the urchins (a type of invertebrate known as echinoderms, which include starfish and sea cucumbers) in the NHM's collection with modern samples will help reveal more about the impact of ocean acidification, often called the "evil twin" of the climate crisis.

[6] Acidification is caused when carbon díoxide is rapidly absorbed into the ocean, where it then reacts with water molecules leading to a fall in the pH of the seawater.

[7] Preliminary findings on Carter's ship, the deep water research vessel the RV Tangaroa, appeared to confirm his worst fears.

[8] "We know that the ocean has been getting more acidic but in most cases we don't know what the impacts are," he says. "We had a suspicion that [due to ocean acidification] you would get less calcium carbonate in the water. This would make it harder to build a body if that body is made from calcium carbonate."

[9] Corals, sea snails, oysters and small single-celled organisms called foraminifera, a component of plankton, all rely on calcium carbonate to build shells. Calcium carbonate dissolves in acid very easily, so the more acid, the harder it is for animals such as these to survive.

[10] While the tests of the historical urchins on Carter's desk were "robust and healthy", those brought to the surface in January were thinner and more fragile in comparison, so much so that they were crushed by the force of the hose used to clean them.

[11] "All the ones we collected were fragile and some of them collapsed," says Carter. "From initial appearances,the modern specimens we collected have weaker tests than the historical ones, but we need to do more work to establish to what degree and exactly what is causing this.

[12] The biological implications of an acidifying ocean could be enormous, adds Carter. "It could make the seas unliveable for things with a calcium skeleton."

[13] During the expedition, the impact of the climate crisis was tangible; some of the study sites were only accessible because of melting ice. And it coincided with stark findings that the level of global sea ice fell to its lowest recorded level, a symptom of our warming planet.

[14] But there were positive findings on the expedition, too. Carter saw as many as 150 whales on his trip, as well as what he described as "crazy levels" of wildlife on the western edge of Coulman island, which had 17 species of starfish in just 100 metres, the same number found in all of the UK's shallow waters.

[15] "It is a thrill to know that the environment is not as bad in some parts of the world as it could be," he says. "It's the only bit of the world you don't see any plastic or human impacts from fishing."

[16] Prof Craig Stevens, an oceanographer who co-led the Tangaroa expedition, described their work as "sweet and sour".

[17] "This lack of ice is having knock-on effects for not only the regional ocean but the whole planet. This work is very sweet and sour. It is amazing to get the opportunity to advance the science, but at the same time, we are catching glimpses of a future for the planet that we really want to avoid. It brings home in a very tangible way the need to limit emissions of climate-affecting gases."

(Adapted from: www.theguardian.com)