Which statement about fossilization is false?...

Questão de Inglês da banca EsFCEx aplicada no concurso EsFCEx (2007). Confira a resolução completa abaixo:

Q199573•
Inglês•
EsFCEx•
EsFCEx•
Aluno EsFCEx

Which statement about fossilization is false?

Fossilization is most saliently manifested in syntactic errors.

Fossilization is a normal and natural stage for many learners.

Fossilized items can always change under the right circumstances.

Fossilization may be accounted for as a result of inappropriate feedback.

Fossilized items are quite common even when learners have a fluent command of the language.

Questões Relacionadas

Q52841•
Inglês•
UFPR•
Polícia Militar PR•
Aspirante da Polícia Militar•
2018

O texto a seguir é referência para a questão.

Ancient dreams of intelligent machines: 3,000 years of robots

    The French philosopher René Descartes was reputedly fond of automata: they inspired his view that living things were biological machines that function like clockwork. Less known is a strange story that began to circulate after the philosopher’s death in 1650. This centred on Descartes’s daughter Francine, who died of scarlet fever at the age of five.
    According to the tale, a distraught Descartes had a clockwork Francine made: a walking, talking simulacrum. When Queen Christina invited the philosopher to Sweden in 1649, he sailed with the automaton concealed in a casket. Suspicious sailors forced the trunk open; when the mechanical child sat up to greet them, the horrified crew threw it overboard.
    The story is probably apocryphal. But it sums up the hopes and fears that have been associated with human-like machines for nearly three millennia. Those who build such devices do so in the hope that they will overcome natural limits – in Descartes’s case, death itself. But this very unnaturalness terrifies and repulses others. In our era of advanced robotics and artificial intelligence (AI), those polarized responses persist, with pundits and the public applauding or warning against each advance. Digging into the deep history of intelligent machines, both real and imagined, we see how these attitudes evolved: from fantasies of trusty mechanical helpers to fears that runaway advances in technology might lead to creatures that supersede humanity itself.

(Disponível em: .)

According to the text, it is correct to say:

In a near future, people will be better prepared to cope with the idea of death.

Humanity will disappear if advances in technology become uncontrollable.

There are groups with different positions about intelligent machines.

The first examples of automata have been attributed to Descartes’ contemporaries.

People have dreamed of human-like machines for more than three thousand years.

Q860619•
Inglês•
Verbo to be

O verbo to be significa "ser" ou "estar". Quanto sua utilização, analise as afirmações abaixo:

I. Pode ser verbo auxiliar, ou seja, acompanhando outro verbo;

II. Pode ser verbo auxiliar e usado no presente, passado ou futuro, nas formas afirmativa, negativa e interrogativa;

III. Quando usado como verbo principal, o verbo to be não precisa estar acompanhado por outro verbo para a frase ter sentido.

Estão corretas:

Q860712•
Inglês•
Verbos modais em inglês

(UEL) Assinale a alternativa que preenche corretamente a lacuna da frase a seguir:

- “Excuse me, sir. __________ you tell me the time?”

- “Sure, it’s 5:20.”

Notificações

Nada por aqui