Questões de Concursos
selecione os filtros para encontrar suas questões de concursos e clique no botão abaixo para filtrar e resolver.
O pensamento moderno talvez seja mais fácil de ser compreendido por nós, pelo fato de estarmos mais próximos dele do que do antigo e do medieval, e por sermos, ainda hoje, de certo modo, herdeiros dessa tradição. Por outro lado, às vezes, é mais difícil tomarmos consciência e explicitarmos as características mais fundamentais daquilo que nos é mais familiar, exatamente porque nos acostumamos a aceitá-lo como tal.
MARCONDES, D. Iniciação à História da Filosofia. p. 151. Jorge Zahar, Rio de Janeiro: 13a. ed.
"É frequente histórias da filosofia não incluírem um capítulo sobre o pensamento contemporâneo, como se considerassem que, de certa forma, a contemporaneidade não fizesse ainda parte da história. Isso é, sob muitos aspectos, compreensível, pois nos faltam ainda o distanciamento e a perspectiva temporal que nos permitem analisar os filósofos contemporâneos, avaliar aqueles cuja obra e influência serão duradouras. Encontramo-nos próximos demais deles, e, paradoxalmente, isso nos impede de vê-los melhor. Por outro lado, há algo de incompleto em uma história da filosofia que não busque ao menos relacionar os pensadores e correntes contemporâneos com a tradição, interpretá-los como parte dessa história, dessa formação e desse desenvolvimento que chegam até nós.”
MARCONDES, D. Iniciação à História da Filosofia. p. 284, Rio de Janeiro, Zahar: 2015, 13a. ed..
TEXT 1
What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?
October 31, 2023 By
Carrie Spector
The launch of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots has triggered an alarm for many educators, who worry about students using the technology to cheat by passing its writing off as their own. But two Stanford researchers say that concern is misdirected, based on their ongoing research into cheating among U.S. high school students before and after the release of ChatGPT.
Here, Lee and Pope discuss the state of cheating in U.S. schools, what research shows about why students cheat, and their recommendations for educators working to address the problem.
What do we know about how much students cheat?
Pope: We know that cheating rates have been high for a long time. At Challenge Success we’ve been running surveys and focus groups at schools for over 15 years, asking students about different aspects of their lives — the amount of sleep they get, homework pressure, extracurricular activities, family expectations, things like that — and also several questions about different forms of cheating.
For years, long before ChatGPT hit the scene, some 60 to 70 percent of students have reported engaging in at least one “cheating” behavior during the previous month. That percentage has stayed about the same or even decreased slightly in our 2023 surveys, when we added questions specific to new AI technologies, like ChatGPT, and how students are using it for school assignments.
So AI isn’t changing how often students cheat — just the tools that they’re using?
Lee: The most prudent thing to say right now is that the data suggest, perhaps to the surprise of many people, that AI is not increasing the frequency of cheating. This may change as students become increasingly familiar with the technology, and we’ll continue to study it and see if and how this changes. But I think it’s important to point out that, in Challenge Success’ most recent survey, students were also asked if and how they felt an AI chatbot like ChatGPT should be allowed for school-related tasks. Many said they thought it should be acceptable for “starter” purposes, like explaining a new concept or generating ideas for a paper. But the vast majority said that using a chatbot to write an entire paper should never be allowed. So this idea that students who’ve never cheated before are going to suddenly run amok and have AI write all of their papers appears unfounded. What would you suggest to school leaders who are concerned about students using AI chatbots?
Pope: Even before ChatGPT, we could never be sure whether kids were getting help from a parent or tutor or another source on their assignments, and this was not considered cheating. Kids in our focus groups are wondering why they can't use ChatGPT as another resource to help them write their papers — not to write the whole thing word for word, but to get the kind of help a parent or tutor would offer. We need to help students and educators find ways to discuss the ethics of using this technology and when it is and isn't useful for student learning.
Lee: There’s a lot of fear about students using this technology. Schools have considered putting significant amounts of money in AI-detection software, which studies show can be highly unreliable. Some districts have tried blocking AI chatbots from school wifi and devices, then repealed those bans because they were ineffective. AI is not going away. Along with addressing the deeper reasons why students cheat, we need to teach students how to understand and think critically about this technology. For starters, at Stanford we’ve begun developing free resources to help teachers bring these topics into the classroom as it relates to different subject areas. We know that 3 teachers don’t have time to introduce a whole new class, but we have been working with teachers to make sure these are activities and lessons that can fit with what they’re already covering in the time they have available.
I think of AI literacy as being akin to driver’s education: We’ve got a powerful tool that can be a great asset, but it can also be dangerous. We want students to learn how to use it responsibly.
Available from: < https://ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating>. Access: 08 Dec., 2023. Adapted.
No contexto da "Dialética do Esclarecimento," coescrita com Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno explora a relação entre racionalidade e dominação na sociedade moderna.
Indique qual dos seguintes conceitos destaca a crítica adorniana à instrumentalização da razão.