De acordo com a NBC TSP 13 - Apresentação de Informação Orçamentária nas Demonstrações Contábeis, para algumas entidades que adotam o mesmo regime para a elaboração do orçamento e das demonstrações contábeis, apenas a identificação das diferenças entre os valores realizados no orçamento e os valores equivalentes nas demonstrações contábeis é exigida.
Isso ocorre quando o orçamento
O estágio da receita pública que consiste no procedimento administrativo do qual se utiliza o Poder Executivo, com o objetivo de verificar a ocorrência do fato gerador, identificando e individualizando o contribuinte ou o devedor, bem como os respectivos valores, espécies e vencimentos, de maneira a constituir o crédito tributário, denomina-se
O Manual de Demonstrativos Fiscais esclarece que a Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal estabeleceu as particularidades para o cômputo das deduções da Receita Corrente Líquida da União, dos Estados, do Distrito Federal e dos Municípios no Demonstrativo da Receita Corrente Líquida.
Assinale a opção que apresenta uma dedução da Receita Corrente Líquida apenas da União.
Ao estudar a remuneração, direitos e vantagens no âmbito da remuneração dos agentes públicos, Helena verificou que o subsídio é uma espécie remuneratória que tem definição constitucional, de modo que decidiu aprofundar os estudos acerca das respectivas peculiaridades.
Nesse contexto, considerando o disposto na CRFB/88 e a orientação do Supremo Tribunal Federal acerca do tema, é correto afirmar que o subsídio
Uma loja de bolsas apresentava os seguintes saldos em seu balanço patrimonial de 31/10/2024: Disponibilidades: R$ 10.000; Estoque: R$ 20.000; Fornecedores (30 dias): R$ 50.000; Patrimônio Líquido: R$ 40.000; Clientes (180 dias): R$ 60.000.
Em novembro de 2024, a loja vendeu metade do seu estoque à vista. A receita deveria ser de R$ 30.000, no entanto, a loja concedeu um desconto sobre o preço de vendas de R$ 2.000.
Além disso, a loja negociou com o seu cliente a antecipação do montante a receber. Desse modo, recebeu R$ 57.000 e extinguiu todo o direito.
Ainda, reconheceu e pagou despesas comerciais e administrativas de R$ 15.000.
As despesas financeiras da loja em novembro de 2024 somaram
Uma empresa de perícia contábil possui imóveis que são alugados a terceiros. Estes são avaliados a valor justo.
Em relação às notas explicativas relacionadas às quantias reconhecidas no resultado referentes a esses ativos, avalie se a empresa deve divulgar as seguintes quantias reconhecidas no resultado

I. lucros de rendas dos ativos.
II. despesa de depreciação dos ativos.
III. gastos operacionais diretos provenientes dos ativos, independentemente de ter gerado rendas durante o período.

Está correto o que se afirma em
A empresa comercial GAMA avalia os seus estoques pelo critério denominado PEPS (Primeiro que Entra, Primeiro que Sai) e apresentou as seguintes informações no período:
Data Fatos 10/06 Aquisição a prazo de 200 unidades por R$ 80,00 cada. 10/06 Despesas com marketing no valor total de R$ 2.000,00. 11/06 Venda a prazo de 170 unidades pelo preço de R$ 115,00 cada. 11/06 Financiamento a pagar no valor de R$ 600,00. 12/06 Aquisição a prazo de 50 unidades por R$ 65,00 cada. 12/06 Empréstimos no valor de R$ 400,00. 13/06 Venda de 60 unidades pelo preço de R$ 115,00 cada. 13/06 Comissões sobre vendas de R$ 1.500,00.
Com base nas informações anteriores, assinale o resultado bruto e líquido do período, respectivamente.
Uma sociedade empresária trabalhava com a venda de material de escritório a terceiros. Em 2024, a sociedade empresária reconheceu as seguintes receitas:

• Venda de participação em empresa controlada: R$ 150.000,00;
• Venda de móveis que eram utilizados na empresa: R$ 200.000,00;
• Venda de terreno que era destinado à valorização: R$ 400.000,00;
• Venda de estoque: R$ 800.000,00.

O valor contabilizado como “Receita de vendas” na Demonstração do Resultado do Exercício da sociedade empresária em 31/12/2024 é de
A receita que não integra o orçamento público, mas que altera a composição do patrimônio financeiro, sem modificar a situação líquida da organização, e cujo recebimento independe de autorização legislativa denomina-se
Considerando-se a Demonstração das Variações Patrimoniais de determinado órgão público, é correto afirmar que as despesas com remuneração de pessoal e com juros de empréstimos obtidos constituem variação patrimonial
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F):

( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.

The statements are, respectively
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The text ends in a note of
A Lei de Diretrizes Orçamentárias conterá Anexo de Riscos Fiscais, no qual serão avaliados os passivos contingentes e outros riscos capazes de afetar as contas públicas, informando as providências a serem tomadas, caso se concretizem.
De modo abrangente, as obrigações financeiras do governo podem ser classificadas, quanto a transparência, em
Segundo o COSO-IC ou COSO I, controle interno é definido como “processo projetado e implementado pelos gestores para mitigar riscos e alcançar objetivos”. Por sua vez, risco é definido como “a possibilidade de ocorrência de um evento que possa afetar o alcance dos objetivos” (COSO, 1992), o que nos leva a entender que o controle irá mitigar esses riscos.
Tendo esse conceito como premissa, o modelo do COSO-IC é representado por um cubro, no qual as três faces visíveis representam: i) tipos de objetivos; ii) níveis da estrutura organizacional e iii) componentes.
Isso posto, assinale a alternativa que contenha o item iii) componentes.
Uma entidade pretende realizar a depreciação de um ativo utilizando o método da soma dos dígitos. Para tanto, detém as seguintes informações:
•  O valor bruto contábil do ativo: R$ 2.600.000,00
•  Valor residual determinado: R$ 600.000,00
•  Valor depreciável de R$ 2.000.000,00
•  Vida útil do ativo: cinco anos
•  Taxa de depreciação ao ano é de: 20%

Assinale a alternativa que, considerando que a depreciação será calculada anualmente, indica o valor arredondado em Reais da depreciação acumulada ao final do quarto ano.
Em janeiro de 2024, uma equipe de fotógrafos foi contratada por uma sociedade empresária, para tirar fotos e produzir material institucional, por R$ 20.000.
O valor foi recebido integralmente em fevereiro, enquanto as fotos foram tiradas em março. O material foi finalizado e aprovado em abril, quando foi entregue à sociedade empresária, que planejava iniciar a divulgação em maio.
De acordo com Regime de Competência, a receita de R$ 20.000 deve ser reconhecida pela equipe de fotógrafos em
Um supermercado utiliza o método do preço de venda a varejo para controle e mensuração dos seus estoques.
Desse modo, cada produto tem seu preço de venda básico determinado com um percentual fixo de lucro bruto sobre o custo desses estoques.
Foi constatado que, no terceiro trimestre de 2024, as vendas de alguns produtos foram feitas por preço diferente do preço básico.
Essa diferença é reconhecida como
Página 12