FURB•
It is a good idea to group less able students together so that:
Questões de Concursos
selecione os filtros para encontrar suas questões de concursos e clique no botão abaixo para filtrar e resolver.
Publicidade
FURB•
Match the examples of teachers classroom language with their functions:
Function
A- checking understanding
B- emphasising word stress
C- drilling
D- nominating
E- monitoring
F- eliciting
G- organizing pairwork
Teachers classroom language
( ) Listen, I like playing football, repeat everyone, I like playing football.
( ) Maria - collect the books, please.
( ) Tell me three adjectives beginning with the letter C.
( ) Just listen to how I say it - poTAtoes.
( ) Okay, discuss it with your partner now, please.
( ) Im really full, Ive just eaten a big lunch. Am I hungry now?
( ) Lets have a look. Yes, thats great. Now try the next one.
The correct sequence is:
FURB•
Read and analyze the following statements, then choose the correct alternative:
FURB•
Match the teachers purposes for using students first language:
I- Asking students to show they know what to do for homework = used for checking understanding
II- Giving individual written feedback to a weak student = used for explaining procedures
III- Telling a large group of teenagers the rules of a game = used for motivating
IV- Encouraging elementary students to try new ways of learning = used for motivating
Check the correct answer:
FURB•
Read and analyze the following statements:
I- According to ECA (Statute of Children and Adolescent) It is the duty of the public authorities only, to ensure, with absolute priority, the effective rights relating to life, health, food, education, sport, leisure, professionalization, culture, dignity, respect, freedom and family and community coexistence. II- The completion of the latest version of the BNCC determines the obligation to teach English language starting in the first grade of elementary school. III- According to the BNCC, teaching English means reviewing the relationships between language, territory and culture, as English speakers are no longer found only in countries where this is the official language. IV- The BNCC understands the learning of English in a perspective of an education that is linguistic, conscious and critical, in which the pedagogical and political dimensions are intrinsically linked.
Choose the alternative with the correct answer:
I- According to ECA (Statute of Children and Adolescent) It is the duty of the public authorities only, to ensure, with absolute priority, the effective rights relating to life, health, food, education, sport, leisure, professionalization, culture, dignity, respect, freedom and family and community coexistence. II- The completion of the latest version of the BNCC determines the obligation to teach English language starting in the first grade of elementary school. III- According to the BNCC, teaching English means reviewing the relationships between language, territory and culture, as English speakers are no longer found only in countries where this is the official language. IV- The BNCC understands the learning of English in a perspective of an education that is linguistic, conscious and critical, in which the pedagogical and political dimensions are intrinsically linked.
Choose the alternative with the correct answer:
FURB•
Read these statements about the Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC), then choose the correct alternative:
FURB•
Observe the following statements regarding to Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL):
I- Learning is improved through increased motivation and the study of natural language seen in context. When learners are interested in a topic they are motivated to acquire language to communicate. II- Language is seen in real-life situations in which students can acquire the language. This is natural language development which builds on other forms of learning. III- Fluency is more important than accuracy and errors are a natural part of language learning. Learners develop fluency in English by using English to communicate for a variety of purposes. IV- CLIL is based on language acquisition focusing severely on learning grammar and sentence structure.
Choose the alternative with the correct answer:
I- Learning is improved through increased motivation and the study of natural language seen in context. When learners are interested in a topic they are motivated to acquire language to communicate. II- Language is seen in real-life situations in which students can acquire the language. This is natural language development which builds on other forms of learning. III- Fluency is more important than accuracy and errors are a natural part of language learning. Learners develop fluency in English by using English to communicate for a variety of purposes. IV- CLIL is based on language acquisition focusing severely on learning grammar and sentence structure.
Choose the alternative with the correct answer:
When aiming to engage teenagers in an English as an
additional language classroom, which of the following
strategies is most effective for promoting active
participation and motivation?
Read the following statements about necessary abilities
to be developed by students of English as an
additional/foreign language. Choose the correct one:
FURB•
How can emotional factors influence language learning in
very young learners?
FURB•
What is the key reason for using visual aids (such as
flashcards and pictures) when teaching English to very
young learners?
FURB•
When teaching English to very young learners, what is
the most effective approach to language learning?
FURB•
Read the following statements about different
methodologies for teaching English as a second
language:
I.The Direct Method focuses on teaching vocabulary and grammar inductively through immersion in the target language, using only the target language for instruction, and avoiding translation or the use of the native language.
II.The Grammar-Translation Method emphasizes the oral use of language and is based on mimicking real-life situations, often using role-play and interactive activities to enhance communication skills.
III.The Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) method centers on using tasks and activities that require real communication, such as problem-solving or project work, to develop language skills in a meaningful context.
IV.The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach emphasizes the importance of meaningful communication and focuses on fluency rather than accuracy, encouraging students to use the language for real-world purposes through interactive activities and discussions.
V.The Audiolingual Method relies heavily on drilling and repetition, often using pattern practice, and emphasizes the structural aspects of language with a focus on correct pronunciation and grammatical structures.
Select the alternative with the correct sequence:
I.The Direct Method focuses on teaching vocabulary and grammar inductively through immersion in the target language, using only the target language for instruction, and avoiding translation or the use of the native language.
II.The Grammar-Translation Method emphasizes the oral use of language and is based on mimicking real-life situations, often using role-play and interactive activities to enhance communication skills.
III.The Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) method centers on using tasks and activities that require real communication, such as problem-solving or project work, to develop language skills in a meaningful context.
IV.The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach emphasizes the importance of meaningful communication and focuses on fluency rather than accuracy, encouraging students to use the language for real-world purposes through interactive activities and discussions.
V.The Audiolingual Method relies heavily on drilling and repetition, often using pattern practice, and emphasizes the structural aspects of language with a focus on correct pronunciation and grammatical structures.
Select the alternative with the correct sequence:
FURB•
What is the process called when two sounds merge into one in connected speech, and which sound is often deleted or weakened in English phonology?
FURB•
In accordance with the Brazilian National Curriculum
Base (BNCC), the integration of plurilingualism and the
recognition of English as a lingua franca are essential
components of language education in Brazil, reflecting
the nation's commitment to fostering communicative
competence and cultural diversity in the English
classroom. About plurilingualism and English as a lingua
franca, observe the following statements and choose the
correct one:
FURB•
Considere a situação a seguir:
O(a) professor(a) de Língua Inglesa de uma escola pública municipal começa a aula pedindo aos alunos que escutem um diálogo em inglês e repitam após ele(a). Os alunos começam a se familiarizar com a pronúncia correta das palavras e a entonação da língua. Em seguida, a(o) professor(a) pede que os alunos realizem exercícios de repetição, para fixar o vocabulário aprendido. Ao final da aula, os alunos estão empolgados e confiantes para praticar a língua inglesa em situações cotidianas.
Podemos afirmar que o método empreendido pelo(a) professor(a) é o:
FURB•
Plurilingualism and translanguaging: commonalities and divergences
Both plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices in the education of language minoritized students remain controversial, for schools have a monolingual and monoglossic tradition that is hard to disrupt, even when the disrupting stance brings success to learners. At issue is the national identity that schools are supposed to develop in their students, and the Eurocentric system of knowledge, circulated through standardized named languages, that continues to impose what Quijano (2000) has called a coloniality of power.
All theories emerge from a place, an experience, a time, and a position, and in this case, plurilingualism and translanguaging have developed, as we have seen, from different loci of enunciation. But concepts do not remain static in a time and place, as educators and researchers take them up, as they travel, and as educators develop alternative practices. Thus, plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes look the same, and sometimes they even have the same practical goals. For example, educators who say they use plurilingual pedagogical practices might insist on developing bilingual identities, and not solely use plurilingualism as a scaffold. And educators who claim to use translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes use them only as a scaffold to the dominant language, not grasping its potential. In the United States, translanguaging pedagogies are often used in English-as-a-Second Language programs only as a scaffold. And although the potential for translanguaging is more likely to be found in bilingual education programs, this is also at times elusive. The potential is curtailed, for example, by the strict language allocation policies that have accompanied the growth of dual language education programs in the last decade in the USA, which come close to the neoliberal understanding of multilingualism espoused in the European Union.
It is important to keep the conceptual distinctions between plurilingualism and translanguaging at the forefront as we develop ways of enacting them in practice, even when pedagogies may turn out to look the same. Because the theoretical stance of translanguaging brings forth and affirms dynamic multilingual realities, it offers the potential to transform minoritized communities sense of self that the concept of plurilingualism may not always do. The purpose of translanguaging could be transformative of socio-political and socio-educational structures that legitimize the language hierarchies that exclude minoritized bilingual students and the epistemological understandings that render them invisible. In its theoretical formulation, translanguaging disrupts the concept of named languages and the power hierarchies in which languages are positioned. But the issue for the future is whether school authorities will allow translanguaging to achieve its potential, or whether it will silence it as simply another kind of scaffold. To the degree that educators act on translanguaging with political intent, it will continue to crack some openings and to open opportunities for bilingual students. Otherwise, the present conceptual differences between plurilingualism and translanguaging will be erased.
Source: GARCÍA, Ofelia; OTHEGUY, Ricardo. Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 23, n. 1, p. 17-35, 2020.
Garcia e Otheguy (2020)
Read the following statements about English and language conceptions:
I.The official document called 'BNCC' treats the English language, prioritizing the focus on the social and political function of the language, in its status as a língua franca.
II.According to BNCC, the concept of English as a foreign language is heavily criticized for its Eurocentric bias.
III.According to BNCC, other language concepts such as international language, global language, additional language and língua franca are more up to date and because of that the term 'foreign language' should be left in the past and never be used in any type of context.
It is correct what is state in:
FURB•
Plurilingualism and translanguaging: commonalities and divergences
Both plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices in the education of language minoritized students remain controversial, for schools have a monolingual and monoglossic tradition that is hard to disrupt, even when the disrupting stance brings success to learners. At issue is the national identity that schools are supposed to develop in their students, and the Eurocentric system of knowledge, circulated through standardized named languages, that continues to impose what Quijano (2000) has called a coloniality of power.
All theories emerge from a place, an experience, a time, and a position, and in this case, plurilingualism and translanguaging have developed, as we have seen, from different loci of enunciation. But concepts do not remain static in a time and place, as educators and researchers take them up, as they travel, and as educators develop alternative practices. Thus, plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes look the same, and sometimes they even have the same practical goals. For example, educators who say they use plurilingual pedagogical practices might insist on developing bilingual identities, and not solely use plurilingualism as a scaffold. And educators who claim to use translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes use them only as a scaffold to the dominant language, not grasping its potential. In the United States, translanguaging pedagogies are often used in English-as-a-Second Language programs only as a scaffold. And although the potential for translanguaging is more likely to be found in bilingual education programs, this is also at times elusive. The potential is curtailed, for example, by the strict language allocation policies that have accompanied the growth of dual language education programs in the last decade in the USA, which come close to the neoliberal understanding of multilingualism espoused in the European Union.
It is important to keep the conceptual distinctions between plurilingualism and translanguaging at the forefront as we develop ways of enacting them in practice, even when pedagogies may turn out to look the same. Because the theoretical stance of translanguaging brings forth and affirms dynamic multilingual realities, it offers the potential to transform minoritized communities sense of self that the concept of plurilingualism may not always do. The purpose of translanguaging could be transformative of socio-political and socio-educational structures that legitimize the language hierarchies that exclude minoritized bilingual students and the epistemological understandings that render them invisible. In its theoretical formulation, translanguaging disrupts the concept of named languages and the power hierarchies in which languages are positioned. But the issue for the future is whether school authorities will allow translanguaging to achieve its potential, or whether it will silence it as simply another kind of scaffold. To the degree that educators act on translanguaging with political intent, it will continue to crack some openings and to open opportunities for bilingual students. Otherwise, the present conceptual differences between plurilingualism and translanguaging will be erased.
Source: GARCÍA, Ofelia; OTHEGUY, Ricardo. Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 23, n. 1, p. 17-35, 2020.
Garcia e Otheguy (2020)
Discourse genres refer to specific types or forms of communication that follow particular conventions, structures, and styles, and are used within specific contexts or communities to convey information, ideas, or meaning effectively. These genres can include various forms such as essays, reports, letters, conversations, speeches, and more, each tailored to suit the purpose and audience of the communication. Said that, consider the following statements about discourse genres in TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages):
I.Discourse genres primarily focus on the structural aspects of language, such as grammar and vocabulary.
II.Discourse genres are a valuable pedagogical tool in TESOL as they provide students with the practical ability to use language in context, enabling effective communication and language acquisition.
III.In TESOL, discourse genres often revolve around written communication and are less relevant in spoken language instruction.
It is correct what is state in:
FURB•
Plurilingualism and translanguaging: commonalities and divergences
Both plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices in the education of language minoritized students remain controversial, for schools have a monolingual and monoglossic tradition that is hard to disrupt, even when the disrupting stance brings success to learners. At issue is the national identity that schools are supposed to develop in their students, and the Eurocentric system of knowledge, circulated through standardized named languages, that continues to impose what Quijano (2000) has called a coloniality of power.
All theories emerge from a place, an experience, a time, and a position, and in this case, plurilingualism and translanguaging have developed, as we have seen, from different loci of enunciation. But concepts do not remain static in a time and place, as educators and researchers take them up, as they travel, and as educators develop alternative practices. Thus, plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes look the same, and sometimes they even have the same practical goals. For example, educators who say they use plurilingual pedagogical practices might insist on developing bilingual identities, and not solely use plurilingualism as a scaffold. And educators who claim to use translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes use them only as a scaffold to the dominant language, not grasping its potential. In the United States, translanguaging pedagogies are often used in English-as-a-Second Language programs only as a scaffold. And although the potential for translanguaging is more likely to be found in bilingual education programs, this is also at times elusive. The potential is curtailed, for example, by the strict language allocation policies that have accompanied the growth of dual language education programs in the last decade in the USA, which come close to the neoliberal understanding of multilingualism espoused in the European Union.
It is important to keep the conceptual distinctions between plurilingualism and translanguaging at the forefront as we develop ways of enacting them in practice, even when pedagogies may turn out to look the same. Because the theoretical stance of translanguaging brings forth and affirms dynamic multilingual realities, it offers the potential to transform minoritized communities sense of self that the concept of plurilingualism may not always do. The purpose of translanguaging could be transformative of socio-political and socio-educational structures that legitimize the language hierarchies that exclude minoritized bilingual students and the epistemological understandings that render them invisible. In its theoretical formulation, translanguaging disrupts the concept of named languages and the power hierarchies in which languages are positioned. But the issue for the future is whether school authorities will allow translanguaging to achieve its potential, or whether it will silence it as simply another kind of scaffold. To the degree that educators act on translanguaging with political intent, it will continue to crack some openings and to open opportunities for bilingual students. Otherwise, the present conceptual differences between plurilingualism and translanguaging will be erased.
Source: GARCÍA, Ofelia; OTHEGUY, Ricardo. Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 23, n. 1, p. 17-35, 2020.
Garcia e Otheguy (2020)
Literacy in an additional language, often referred to as "second language literacy" or "bilingual literacy," encompasses the ability to read, write, understand, and effectively ____________ using a language other than one's native or primary language.
Select the option that correctly fills the gap in the statement:
FURB•
Plurilingualism and translanguaging: commonalities and divergences
Both plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices in the education of language minoritized students remain controversial, for schools have a monolingual and monoglossic tradition that is hard to disrupt, even when the disrupting stance brings success to learners. At issue is the national identity that schools are supposed to develop in their students, and the Eurocentric system of knowledge, circulated through standardized named languages, that continues to impose what Quijano (2000) has called a coloniality of power.
All theories emerge from a place, an experience, a time, and a position, and in this case, plurilingualism and translanguaging have developed, as we have seen, from different loci of enunciation. But concepts do not remain static in a time and place, as educators and researchers take them up, as they travel, and as educators develop alternative practices. Thus, plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes look the same, and sometimes they even have the same practical goals. For example, educators who say they use plurilingual pedagogical practices might insist on developing bilingual identities, and not solely use plurilingualism as a scaffold. And educators who claim to use translanguaging pedagogical practices sometimes use them only as a scaffold to the dominant language, not grasping its potential. In the United States, translanguaging pedagogies are often used in English-as-a-Second Language programs only as a scaffold. And although the potential for translanguaging is more likely to be found in bilingual education programs, this is also at times elusive. The potential is curtailed, for example, by the strict language allocation policies that have accompanied the growth of dual language education programs in the last decade in the USA, which come close to the neoliberal understanding of multilingualism espoused in the European Union.
It is important to keep the conceptual distinctions between plurilingualism and translanguaging at the forefront as we develop ways of enacting them in practice, even when pedagogies may turn out to look the same. Because the theoretical stance of translanguaging brings forth and affirms dynamic multilingual realities, it offers the potential to transform minoritized communities sense of self that the concept of plurilingualism may not always do. The purpose of translanguaging could be transformative of socio-political and socio-educational structures that legitimize the language hierarchies that exclude minoritized bilingual students and the epistemological understandings that render them invisible. In its theoretical formulation, translanguaging disrupts the concept of named languages and the power hierarchies in which languages are positioned. But the issue for the future is whether school authorities will allow translanguaging to achieve its potential, or whether it will silence it as simply another kind of scaffold. To the degree that educators act on translanguaging with political intent, it will continue to crack some openings and to open opportunities for bilingual students. Otherwise, the present conceptual differences between plurilingualism and translanguaging will be erased.
Source: GARCÍA, Ofelia; OTHEGUY, Ricardo. Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 23, n. 1, p. 17-35, 2020.
Garcia e Otheguy (2020)
Consider the statements related to the text presented below. Write T, for true, and F, for false:
(__)According to the text, educators who use plurilingual pedagogical practices insist on developing monolingual identities.
(__)Translanguaging pedagogies in the United States are used only as a scaffold in bilingual education programs.
(__)Plurilingual and translanguaging pedagogical practices are controversial in the education of language minoritized students.
Select the alternative with the correct sequence:
Publicidade