A parte da África localizada ao sul do equador foi habitada por povos cuja língua falada pertencia a um tronco linguístico com dezenas de famílias e cerca de 470 línguas,as quais atualmente são faladas por aproximadamente 100 milhões de pessoas em territórios como o Congo,Angola e Moçambique.Por extensão,os povos que falam essas línguas são chamados de
Questões de Concursos
selecione os filtros para encontrar suas questões de concursos e clique no botão abaixo para filtrar e resolver.
Publicidade
“As águas superficiais constituem parte da riqueza dos recursos hídricos de um país. No caso brasileiro, país de extensão continental, a rede fluvial é importante recurso natural, contando em seu território com a maior bacia fluvial do mundo em extensão e em volume de água.”
Cunha, S. B. Bacias hidrográficas. Geomorfologia do Brasil. Cunha, S. B.; Guerra, A. J. T. Rio de Janeiro Bertrand Brasil. 2003. p.229.
Considerando as bacias hidrográficas brasileiras, seus processos e principais características, analise as seguintes afirmações:
I. Alguns dos principais rios brasileiros originam-se a partir de três grandes centros dispersores de água: a Cordilheira dos Andes, o Planalto das Guianas e o Planalto Brasileiro.
II. Com diferentes regimes e características, muitos rios brasileiros são barrados com a finalidade de gerar energia, abastecer populações e irrigar áreas diversas.
III. O rio Paraná é um rio tipicamente de planalto que flui escalonadamente pelo PlanaltoMeridional, permitindo, dessa forma, a instalação de um dos sistemas elétricos mais importantes do país.
Está correto o que se afirmar em
O jardim botânico, localizado em uma região
serrana, é dedicado à exposição de plantas
ornamentais e florais. Os roseirais, espaços onde são
plantadas rosas, ocupam várias áreas circulares cujas
muretas que as delimitam formam circunferências. Se
a extensão de cada uma destas circunferências é 18
metros, a área ocupada por cada roseiral, em m2
, é
aproximadamente
Use o número racional 3,14 como aproximação para o número π.
Use o número racional 3,14 como aproximação para o número π.
A respeito dos novos sistemas técnicos de
comunicação e transporte de pessoas e
mercadorias, bem como das novas articulações em
redes urbanas no Brasil, e a atuação e importância
das políticas de desenvolvimento territorial do
Estado brasileiro, é correto afirmar que
No que diz respeito à fotossíntese, escreva V ou F conforme seja verdadeiro ou falso o que se afirma nos itens abaixo.
( ) É um processo metabólico em que a energia solar é capturada e usada na conversão de dióxido de carbono e água em carboidratos e oxigênio.
( ) Existem três formas diferentes de rota independente da luz que reduz o dióxido de carbono: ciclo de Calvin, fotossíntese C4 e metabolismo ácido das crassuláceas.
( ) As reações dependentes de luz convertem energia luminosa em energia química.
( ) A clorofila excitada no centro de reação atua como agente oxidante, absorvendo elétrons, para reduzir um aceptor de elétrons instáveis.
Está correta, de cima para baixo, a seguinte sequência:
Apunta la palabra bisílaba.
Os Jogos Olímpicos de Tóquio, que deveriam ter
sido realizados em 2020, somente ocorreram neste
ano de 2021, entre junho e agosto. Durante os jogos,
é estimulada a prática dos valores olímpicos dentre os
quais se encontram:
A série Cobra Kai, transmitida na NETFLIX, mostra uma visão peculiar da filosofia do Karate. Com o lema “Acerte primeiro, bata com força, sem piedade” os alunos de um Dojo (local de treino) evidenciam a influência de um sensei (professor) em impor o seu ponto de vista a respeito da modalidade.
Considerando as boas práticas das Artes Marciais, é correto afirmar que um professor deve
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
According to John Kerry, the LEAF coalition
constitutes an essential endeavor towards the
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
Statistics related to deforestation in tropical
forests show that in 2020 it
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
Still about the countries which will receive
financial support from the coalition to reduce
emissions and deforestation, the text mentions that
they will
El demostrativo está empleado correctamente
en:
UECE•
En español, si uno es manco, tiene problemas
en
Atente para a seguinte citação a respeito do
índio:
“O índio não é uma questão de cocar de pena, urucum e arco e flecha, algo de aparente e evidente nesse sentido estereotipificante, mas sim uma questão de ‘estado de espírito’. Um modo de ser e não um modo de aparecer. Na verdade, algo mais (ou menos) que um modo de ser: a indianidade designava para nós um certo modo de devir, algo essencialmente invisível, mas nem por isso menos eficaz: um movimento infinitesimal incessante de diferenciação, não um estado massivo de ‘diferença’ anteriorizada e estabilizada, isto é, uma identidade (um dia seria bom os antropólogos pararem de chamar identidade de diferença e vice-versa). A nossa luta, portanto, era conceitual: nosso problema era fazer com que o ‘ainda’ do juízo de senso comum ‘esse pessoal ainda é índio’ (ou ‘não é mais’) não significasse um estado transitório ou uma etapa a ser vencida. A ideia é a de que os índios ‘ainda’ não tinham sido vencidos, nem jamais o seriam. Eles jamais acabar(i)am de ser índios, ‘ainda que’... Ou justamente porquê. Em suma, a ideia era que ‘índio’ não podia ser visto como uma etapa na marcha ascensional até o invejável estado de ‘branco’ ou ‘civilizado’”.
CASTRO, Eduardo Viveiro de, “No Brasil todo mundo é índio, exceto quem não é”, entrevista concedida à equipe de edição do livro Povos Indígenas no Brasil, Instituto Socioambiental (ISA), 2006.
Considerando o texto, acima apresentado, avalie as seguintes proposições: I. A integração dos povos indígenas à sociedade brasileira não significa a perda de suas culturas e de suas identidades socioculturais. II. Os povos indígenas não deixam de ser índios enquanto mantiverem o sentimento de pertencer às suas comunidades e de serem reconhecidos como indígenas, mesmo morando em cidades e participando da vida moderna da atual sociedade brasileira.
Sobre essas afirmações, é correto dizer que
“O índio não é uma questão de cocar de pena, urucum e arco e flecha, algo de aparente e evidente nesse sentido estereotipificante, mas sim uma questão de ‘estado de espírito’. Um modo de ser e não um modo de aparecer. Na verdade, algo mais (ou menos) que um modo de ser: a indianidade designava para nós um certo modo de devir, algo essencialmente invisível, mas nem por isso menos eficaz: um movimento infinitesimal incessante de diferenciação, não um estado massivo de ‘diferença’ anteriorizada e estabilizada, isto é, uma identidade (um dia seria bom os antropólogos pararem de chamar identidade de diferença e vice-versa). A nossa luta, portanto, era conceitual: nosso problema era fazer com que o ‘ainda’ do juízo de senso comum ‘esse pessoal ainda é índio’ (ou ‘não é mais’) não significasse um estado transitório ou uma etapa a ser vencida. A ideia é a de que os índios ‘ainda’ não tinham sido vencidos, nem jamais o seriam. Eles jamais acabar(i)am de ser índios, ‘ainda que’... Ou justamente porquê. Em suma, a ideia era que ‘índio’ não podia ser visto como uma etapa na marcha ascensional até o invejável estado de ‘branco’ ou ‘civilizado’”.
CASTRO, Eduardo Viveiro de, “No Brasil todo mundo é índio, exceto quem não é”, entrevista concedida à equipe de edição do livro Povos Indígenas no Brasil, Instituto Socioambiental (ISA), 2006.
Considerando o texto, acima apresentado, avalie as seguintes proposições: I. A integração dos povos indígenas à sociedade brasileira não significa a perda de suas culturas e de suas identidades socioculturais. II. Os povos indígenas não deixam de ser índios enquanto mantiverem o sentimento de pertencer às suas comunidades e de serem reconhecidos como indígenas, mesmo morando em cidades e participando da vida moderna da atual sociedade brasileira.
Sobre essas afirmações, é correto dizer que
T E X T
I Used to Fear Being a Nobody. Then I Left
Social Media.
By Bianca Brooks
“What’s happening?”
I stare blankly at the little box as I try to think of something clever for my first tweet. I settle on what’s at the top of my mind: “My only #fear is being a nobody.” How could I know this exchange would begin a dialogue that would continue nearly every day for the next nine years of my life?
I began using Twitter in 2010 as a newly minted high school freshman. Though it began as a hub for my quirky adolescent thoughts, over the years it became an archive of my emotional and intellectual voice — a kind of virtual display for the evolution of my politics and artistic identity. Butafter nine years, it was time to close the archive. My wanting to share my every waking thought became eclipsed by a desire for an increasingly rare commodity — a private life.
Though I thought disappearing from social media would be as simple as logging off, my refusal to post anything caused a bit of a stir among my small but loyal following. I began to receive emails from strangers asking me where I had gone and when I would return. One message read: “Not to be over familiar, but you have to come back eventually. You’re a writer after all. How will we read your writing?” Another follower inquired, “Where will you go?”
The truth is I have not gone anywhere. I am, in fact, more present than ever
Over time, I have begun to sense these messages reveal more than a lack of respect for privacy. I realize that to many millennials, a life without a social media presence is not simply a private life; it is no life at all: We possess a widespread, genuine fear of obscurity.
When I consider the near-decade I have spent on social media, this worry makes sense. As with many in my generation, Twitter was my entry into conversations happening on a global scale; long before my byline graced any publication, tweeting was how I felt a part of the world. Twitter functions much like an echo chamber dependent on likes and retweets, and gaining notoriety is as easy as finding someone to agree with you. For years I poured my opinions, musings and outrage onto my timeline, believing I held an indispensable place in a vital sociopolitical experiment.
But these passionate, public observations were born of more than just a desire to speak my mind — I was measuring my individual worth in constant visibility. Implicit in my follower’s question “Where will you go?” is the resounding question “How will we know where you’ve gone?” Privacy is considered a small exchange for the security of being well known and well liked.
After all, a private life boasts no location markers or story updates. The idea that the happenings of our lives would be constrained to our immediate families, friends and real-life communities is akin to social death in a world measured by followers, views, likes and shares.
I grow weary when I think of this as the new normal for what is considered to be a fruitful personal life. Social media is no longer a mere public extension of our private socialization; it has become a replacement for it. What happens to our humanity when we relegate our real lives to props for the performance of our virtual ones?
For one, a predominantly online existence can lull us into a dubious sense of having enacted concrete change, simply because of a tweet or Instagram post. As “hashtag activism” has obscured longstanding traditions of assembly and protest, there’s concern that a failure to transition from the keyboard to in-person organization will effectively stall or kill the momentum of political movements. (See: Occupy Wall Street.)
The sanctity of our most intimate experiences is also diminished. My grandfather Charles Shaw — a notable musician whose wisdoms and jazz scene tales I often shared on Twitter — passed away last year. Rather than take adequate time to privately mourn the loss of his giant influence in my life alongside those who loved him most, I quickly posted a lengthy tribute to him to my followers. At the time I thought, “How will they remember him if I don’t acknowledge his passing?”
Perhaps at the root of this anxiety over being forgotten is an urgent question of how one ought to form a legacy; with the rise of automation, a widening wealth gap and an unstable political climate, it is easy to feel unimportant. It is almost as if the world is too big and we are much too small to excel in it in any meaningful way. We feel we need as many people as possible to witness our lives, so as not to be left out of a story that is being written too fast by people much more significant than ourselves.
“The secret of a full life is to live and relate to others as if they might not be there tomorrow, as if you might not be there tomorrow,” the writer Anais Nin said. “This feeling has become a rarity, and rarer every day now that we have reached a hastier and more superficial rhythm, now that we believe we are in touch with a greater amount of people. This is the illusion which might cheat us of being in touch deeply with the one breathing next to us.”
I think of those words and at once any fear of obscurity is eclipsed by much deeper ones — the fear of forgoing the sacred moments of life, of never learning to be completely alone, of not bearing witness to the incredible lives of those who surround me.
I observe the world around me. It is big and moving fast. “What’s happening?” I think to myself.
I’m just beginning to find out.
From:www.nytimes.com/Oct. 1, 2019
For the author herself, Twitter was the platform
for important things in her life, including the
São vidrarias utilizadas adequadamente para
uma titulação:
UECE•
Atente para o seguinte excerto:
“Surgindo em 25 de maio de 1870 a primeira sociedade libertadora na província do Ceará –a de Baturité e, posteriormente, em 25 de junho do mesmo ano, a de Sobral, denominada Sociedade Manumissora Sobralense. Ambas compostas, na sua grande maioria, por indivíduos pertencentes aos setores médio e alto da sociedade cearense. Em 1879 surge a Sociedade Perseverança e Porvir, fundada por 10 sócios [...]. Essa sociedade foi a progenitora da Sociedade Cearense Libertadora (S.C.L), fundada um ano depois”
CAXILÉ, Carlos Rafael V. Olhar que Enxerga Além das Efemérides: o Movimento [...] na Província do Ceará (1871-1884). Anais do XVII Encontro Regional de História –O lugar da História. ANPUH/SPUNICAMP. Campinas, 6 a 10 de setembro de 2004, p.3-4.
Sobre essas sociedades libertadoras surgidas na província do Ceará a partir da década de 1870, é correto afirmar que
Apunta la frase abajo donde la preposición resaltada
indica modo.
Atente para o seguinte excerto: “O Brasil, por suas condições climáticas e grandes extensões de maciços montanhosos, está sujeito aos desastres associados aos movimentos de massa nas encostas”.
Fernandes, N. F. e Amaral, C. P. do. Movimentos de massa: uma abordagem geológico-geomorfológica. In. Geomorfologia e meio ambiente. Guerra, A. J. T. e Cunha, S. B.da. Rio de Janeiro. Bertrand Brasil. 1996.
Considerando o texto acima sobre os movimentos de massa no Brasil, é correto concluir que a principal causa desses eventos, nas áreas urbanas ocupadas, está associada
A dimensão geográfica da saúde no Brasil
ganhou ainda mais importância no recente período
da pandemia de Covid 19, porém, a regionalização
da oferta dos serviços de saúde, principalmente do
Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), desde a sua criação
em 1988, é tema importantíssimo para a vida e
saúde do residente em território brasileiro. Com
relação à geografia da saúde no Brasil, assinale a
afirmação verdadeira.
Publicidade