The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new material and recycle familiar material, it will include some ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or more quickly than you had anticipated.

What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that you include both subject area content and language points so that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the detriment of the other.

The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:

Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what subject area material – do you want to transmit? How are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?

It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class, they should know… If you have a cooperating content area teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.

Language – Once you have the content pinned down, you can pick out the necessary language and communication skills that students will need to engage with the material. For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary, functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text organization.

You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you present, but also in the language that students need to complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before presenting students with the task.

(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)

Read the text to answer questions from.

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) was a 1970s reaction to much that had gone before, and has guiding principles: first, language is not just patterns of grammar with vocabulary items slotted in; it also involves language functions such as inviting, agreeing and disagreeing, suggesting, etc., which students should learn how to perform using a variety of language exponents (e.g. we can invite by saying “Would you like to come to the cinema?’, ‘D’you fancy coming to the cinema?’, ‘What about coming to the cinema?’, ‘How about a film?’, ‘Are you on for a film?, etc). Students also need to be aware of the need for appropriacy when talking and writing to people in terms of the kind of language they use (formal, informal, tentative, technical, etc). CLT is not just about the language; it is actually about how it is used.

The second principle of Communicative Language Teaching is that if students get enough exposure to language, and opportunities for language use, and if they are motivated, then language learning will take care of itself. Thus, CLT has a lot in common with the acquisition view of language absorption. As a result, the focus of much CLT has been on students communicating real messages, and not just grammatically controlled language. The deployment of many communicative activities, where students use all and any language they know to communicate, shows this aspect of CLT at work.

(Harmer, J. 1998. Adaptado)

Lea el siguiente texto para responder la cuestione.

Procrastinar es el hábito de posponer las actividades importantes para dedicar el tiempo a tareas más entretenidas, pero menos relevantes. Hasta no hace muchos años, procrastinación era una palabra que no conocía casi nadie fuera del ámbito de la psicología y otras disciplinas dedicadas a estudiar el comportamiento humano. En los últimos años, sin embargo, se ha difundido a gran velocidad. Tal vez porque la vida moderna, tan cargada de distracciones y estímulos nuevos, nos hace cada vez más procrastinadores.

Es necesario tener en cuenta que, según diversos estudios, el 20% de los adultos se autoperciben como procrastinadores crónicos, porcentaje que aumenta hasta el 50% en la población estudiantil. A tal punto que muchos trabajos aluden al llamado “síndrome del estudiante”: la tendencia a comenzar las tareas lo más tarde posible, tras desperdiciar mucho tiempo en el comienzo del plazo asignado, y llegar a la fecha límite sometido a elevados niveles de estrés.

Si bien no es un trastorno, los niveles elevados de procrastinación se asocian con problemas más importantes, como un aumento en el estrés y la ansiedad, bajo rendimiento escolar y laboral y el empeoramiento de algunas enfermedades. Así lo explica, por ejemplo, un artículo publicado en 2013 por investigadores canadienses. De acuerdo con los autores de este trabajo, además, las causas no hay que buscarlas tanto en la pereza o en la mala gestión del tiempo. Al contrario, su origen radica en problemas para la regulación de las emociones. “La procrastinación tiene mucho que ver con la reparación del estado de ánimo en el corto plazo”, explica el texto. Por ello, se trata de un proceso irracional, dado que la prioridad de sentirse bien en el momento presente se impone por sobre las consecuencias negativas que – la propia persona lo sabe – deberá asumir su yo futuro.

Científicos alemanes, en 2018, descubrieron que el origen de la procrastinación podría hallarse en unas conexiones cerebrales débiles. Tras escanear los cerebros de 264 personas a las que también encuestaron acerca de sus hábitos dilatorios, llegaron a la conclusión de que los procrastinadores tienen más grande la amígdala, una estructura cerebral que procesa las emociones y controla la motivación. Según este trabajo, estas personas tienen mayores dificultades para eludir las emociones y distracciones, y debido a eso posponen su actividad. Todo lo cual viene a corroborar la idea de que no se trata de desgana ni de desorden en el manejo del tiempo: la clave de la procrastinación se halla en el control de las emociones.

(https://www.eldiario.es)

Lesen Sie die Äußerung einer Schülerin zum Thema „Frontalunterricht“ und kreuzen Sie bei Frage die korrekte Lösung an.

Bei uns im Unterricht machen immer alle dasselbe und zwar, was die Lehrerin sagt. Sie ist sehr nett, aber sie macht immer so schnell. Sie erklärt uns etwas, oft schreibt sie auch etwas an die Tafel, zum Beispiel Grammatikregeln, und dann meint sie, dass wir das alle verstanden haben. Und sie fragt und korrigiert uns dann immer gleich, da bin ich oft froh, wenn ich nicht drankomme. Wir sind doch so verschieden! Meine Freundin zum Beispiel kann Wörter am besten über Bilder lernen, ich mache das nicht so gerne, sie kann sich auch Wörter viel schneller merken als ich, ich muss mir die immer nochmal in Ruhe zu Hause ansehen. Außerdem habe ich oft keine große Lust auf den Unterricht, weil ich nicht so viel zum Sprechen komme. Die meiste Zeit redet die Lehrerin und wenn wir zum Beispiel was erzählen sollen, melden sich andere oft schneller. Für mich wäre es manchmal einfacher, wenn ich erstmal mit meiner Nachbarin darüber sprechen könnte.

(Funk, H. et al. Aufgaben, Übungen, Interaktion. Deutsch lehren lernen 4.

München: Klett-Langenscheidt, 2015)

Read the suggestion of an activity to answer question.

As part of a joint project between language and science with focus on the human body, a way for the language teacher to start working with vocabulary is to ask learners to work on words related to that topic (for example, one of the systems in the human body), brainstorming the following aspects:

•  words which are special to your subject (ex. the human body systems).

•  words which ‘collocate with’ (or often accompany) your main theme (ex. The respiratory system).

•  everyday words which are used in your subject and may have different meanings in other contexts (ex. tissue).

Once learners have come up with some suggestions, the teacher can ask them to share their contributions with other learners in the class, and complement their own notes.

(Based on DALE, Liz; TANNER, Rosie. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2012)

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a dual-focused educational approach in which an additional language* is used for the learning and teaching of both content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of language education. It is not a new form of subject education. It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and shares some elements of a range of educational practices. Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific countries and contexts; others, such as content-based language teaching or English as an Additional Language (EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both extends the experience of learning a language, and where it becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.

* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language or some form of heritage or community language.”

(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)

Read the text to answer question.

All teachers, whether at the start of their careers or after some years of teaching, need to be able to try out new activities and techniques. It is important to be open to such new ideas and take them into the classroom.

But such experimentation will be of little use unless we can then evaluate these activities. Were they successful? Did the students enjoy them? Did they learn anything from them? How could the activities be changed to make them more effective next time?

One way of getting feedback is to ask students simple questions such as ‘Did you like that exercise? Did you find it useful?’ and see what they say. But not all students will discuss topics like this openly in class. It may be better to ask them to write their answers down and hand them in.

Another way of getting reactions to new techniques is to invite a colleague into the classroom and ask him or her to observe what happens and make suggestions afterwards. The lesson could also be videoed.

In general, it is a good idea to get students’ reactions to lessons, and their aspirations about them, clearly stated. Many teachers encourage students to say what they feel about the lessons and how they think the course is going. The simplest way to do this is to ask students once every fortnight, for example, to write down two things they want more of and two things they want less of. The answers you get may prove a fruitful place to start a discussion, and you will then be able to modify what happens in class, if you think it appropriate, in the light of your students’ feelings. Such modifications will greatly enhance the teacher’s ability to manage the class.

Good teacher managers also need to assess how well their students are progressing. This can be done through a variety of measures including homework assignments, speaking activities where the teacher scores the participation of each student, and frequent small progress tests. Good teachers keep a record of their students’ achievements so that they are always aware of how they are getting on. Only if teachers keep such kinds of progress records can they begin to see when teaching and learning has or has not been successful.

(Harmer, Jeremy. How to teach English. Londres: Longman, 1998)

The paper reflects on the role of technology in English language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact of globalization and internationalization in education in general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on the assumption that access to information and technology is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003) and that this access requires some English knowledge and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM, 2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may bring negative consequences to the development of English language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002; KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY, 1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The study also suggests that the informed use of technologies and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as an international language are essential to leverage the development and the internationalization of education in Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.

(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)