Questões de Concursos

Texto 1

Lea con atención el cuento de abajo y en seguida conteste la pregunta

Programa de entretenimiento

de Ana María Shua

Es un programa de juegos por la tele. Los niños se ponen zapatillas de la marca que auspicia el programa. Cada madre debe reconocer a su hijo mirando solamente las piernitas a través de una ventana en el decorado. El país es pobre, los premios son importantes. Los participantes se ponen de acuerdo para ganar siempre. Si alguna madre se equivoca, no lo dice. Después, cada una se lleva al hijo que eligió, aunque no sea el mismo que traía al llegar. Es necesario mantener la farsa largamente porque la empresa controla con visitadoras sociales los hogares de los concursantes. Hay hijos que salen perdiendo, pero a otros el cambio les conviene. También se dice que algunas madres hacen trampa, que se equivocan adrede.

Shua, Ana María. Cazadores de letras. Minificción reunida. Madrid: Páginas de Espuma, 2009. p. 108.

Texto 1

Lea con atención el cuento de abajo y en seguida conteste la pregunta

Programa de entretenimiento

de Ana María Shua

Es un programa de juegos por la tele. Los niños se ponen zapatillas de la marca que auspicia el programa. Cada madre debe reconocer a su hijo mirando solamente las piernitas a través de una ventana en el decorado. El país es pobre, los premios son importantes. Los participantes se ponen de acuerdo para ganar siempre. Si alguna madre se equivoca, no lo dice. Después, cada una se lleva al hijo que eligió, aunque no sea el mismo que traía al llegar. Es necesario mantener la farsa largamente porque la empresa controla con visitadoras sociales los hogares de los concursantes. Hay hijos que salen perdiendo, pero a otros el cambio les conviene. También se dice que algunas madres hacen trampa, que se equivocan adrede.

Shua, Ana María. Cazadores de letras. Minificción reunida. Madrid: Páginas de Espuma, 2009. p. 108.

Text

Reading skill will help you to improve your understanding of the language and build your vocabulary.

Read the text below carefully.

Social media, magazines and shop windows bombard people daily with things to buy, and British consumers are buying more clothes and shoes than ever before. Online shopping means it is easy for customers to buy without thinking, while major brands offer such cheap clothes that they can be treated like disposable items – worn two or three times and then thrown away

In Britain, the average person spends more than £1,000 on new clothes a year, which is around four per cent of their income. That might not sound like much, but that figure hides two far more worrying trends for society and for the environment. First, a lot of that consumer spending is via credit cards. British people currently owe approximately £670 per adult to credit card companies. That’s 66 per cent of the average wardrobe budget. Also, not only are people spending money they don’t have, they’re using it to buy things they don’t need. Britain throws away 300,000 tons of clothing a year, most of which goes into landfill sites.

People might not realize they are part of the disposable clothing problem because they donate their unwanted clothes to charities. But charity shops can’t sell all those unwanted clothes. Fast fashion goes out of fashion as quickly as it came in and is often too poor quality to recycle; people don’t want to buy it second-hand. Huge quantities end up being thrown away, and a lot of clothes that charities can’t sell are sent abroad, causing even more economic and environmental problems.

However, a different trend is springing up in opposition to consumerism – the ‘buy nothing’ trend. The idea originated in Canada in the early 1990s and then moved to the US, where it became a rejection of the overspending and overconsumption of Black Friday and Cyber Monday during Thanksgiving weekend. On Buy Nothing Day people organize various types of protests and cut up their credit cards. Throughout the year, Buy Nothing groups organize the exchange and repair of items they already own.

The trend has now reached influencers on social media who usually share posts of clothing and make- -up that they recommend for people to buy. Some YouTube stars now encourage their viewers not to buy anything at all for periods as long as a year. Two friends in Canada spent a year working towards buying only food. For the first three months they learned how to live without buying electrical goods, clothes or things for the house. For the next stage, they gave up services, for example haircuts, eating out at restaurants or buying petrol for their cars. In one year, they’d saved $55,000.

The changes they made meant two fewer cars on the roads, a reduction in plastic and paper packaging and a positive impact on the environment from all the energy saved. If everyone followed a similar plan, the results would be impressive. But even if you can’t manage a full year without going shopping, you can participate in the anti-consumerist movement by refusing to buy things you don’t need. Buy Nothing groups send a clear message to companies that people are no longer willing to accept the environmental and human cost of overconsumption.

source: learnenglish.britishcouncil.org